Just like the Bird's Nest incident, at the beginning, the fans said that the quality of the Bird's Nest was not good, and Simba began to completely blame the fans and felt that they were unreasonable. When a product sold live has quality problems, it is not to test whether the product is really qualified, but to blame the fans. Later, the incident fermented for a while, only to find that the Bird's Nest incident intensified and finally began to sit still. Apologize and reflect. Some people have begun to say that Simba may be out of breath and cold this time. Finally, the punishment given by the relevant departments was a fine, and his behavior did not touch the law. Because Simba only over-advertised the quality and efficacy of the products, and did not participate in the production process of the factory.
But then again, many things are publicized in this way now, which will be exaggerated and sometimes understandable. Because you don't brag about how good your products are, consumers will be tempted if you don't tell them, so how can they pay? Every Potter praises his pot. At this time, good is better than bad, and different people have different opinions. For Bentley moon cakes, Simba's team also said that the supplier misled them. After they found the problem, they didn't deliver the goods and paid the customers who bought the products. Personally, I think this is still done in place.
Live broadcast with goods, we also need rational consumption. Sometimes the anchor that fans trust may just regard fans as leeks that can be harvested at will. This needs to polish your eyes.