(Part III and IV)

Part III: Can I see the facts?

1

Let's ask the first question: all trends are based on facts. If you want to grasp the small trend, you must be able to recognize the facts. The question is, can we see the truth?

There is a gap between the feeling world and the real world. There are two forces. On the one hand, human beings try their best to distort the facts; On the one hand, the world is trying to hide itself and widen the gap.

[Are there any facts in this world? The world exists objectively, but everyone's world is different from everyone's. Everyone's world is his own feeling world, and everyone's world is self-centered. So whose world is the objective world? Does it matter whose world is objective? ]

2

Many people will think that most people in China participated in the Double Eleven, but they will think that fewer and fewer people are watching the Spring Festival Gala. But is this a fact? The opposite is true. There are many more people who want to watch the Spring Festival Gala than those who participate in the Double Eleven.

Do you think you represent "many people"? The truth is just that you can't see it, at least the leaders of the advertising department who refused you in the Spring Festival Evening can see it. ]

three

Media person Shen Shuaibo has a saying: "In China, at least 100 million people don't know what is well known. Most of the time, 100 million people don't know."

["As we all know"? It's just that people in your circle know. He knows that he cares; He cares, he knows. And more people don't know or care. ]

Lin Xinhao asked a question: What does the equal sign mean? Do the left and right have exactly the same meaning? No, the equal sign means that some things are not important.

For example, when I say 1+2=2+ 1, I'm actually saying that the total is important, not the order. For example, if I say there are three people in your family and three people in my family, that adds up to six people. This is actually saying that the scale is important and the specific relationship between everyone is not important. For example, when we say that getting a good major equals job security, we are actually saying that income is very important, but your hobbies are not.

[Mathematics is interesting, just a way of playing mathematics. Please automatically ignore Luo Pang's advertisement to get an APP for his children. ]

Mr. Liu Run is offering a new course for "Acquisition", focusing on business insight. He said: without abstraction, you can't think deeply; Without repair, we can't see our true colors.

[Luo Pang has been planting advertisements, and the person he mentioned is the author of the product they got. His circle is this big? Just sit and look at the sky. ]

Everyone who has been in contact knows that the introducer takes out a piece of paper with the other person's height, age, income, education, work, hobbies and even photos. I can give you any data you want, but can you decide whether to marry her or not? I can't. I have to meet, have dinner and try for a while. This is abstraction and reduction, both of which are indispensable.

Because the person you want to marry must be a real person, not an abstract symbol, so you should show the real person around. However, as far as academics are concerned, as far as scientists are concerned, their work objects are those abstract symbols, and they don't need to be restored or even live. Many scientists have poor self-care ability, such as Chen Jingrun. ]

Restoring ability is the most scarce ability for us to get close to the truth and grasp small trends.

[This pit has been dug, waiting for you to jump. ]

four

Restoring ability is a pair of glasses that we are close to the truth. With this pair of glasses, you can see the world in a completely different way and evaluate its value.

[Give a definition to this new concept. ]

For example, we often say that there are two industries, one is service industry and the other is manufacturing industry, which sounds very equivalent. Let's assume that they produce the same GDP. Which industry is more valuable?

[Luo Pang, don't you even have at least political knowledge? Service industry is the tertiary industry and manufacturing industry is the secondary industry. Which is more important? Why not mention agriculture? Agriculture is the primary industry. Without agriculture, everything else is scum. ]

five

The power of reduction is extremely important, but it is easily overlooked. Then the question is, how can we have the ability to restore?

[Don't listen, buy his "get" and you can have it. ]

In fact, the specific practice method has long been said, that is, six words-multiple thinking mode. Let many models of understanding the world coexist in your own mind.

This year, we tried a new project called "Getting a University". It is a brand-new thing for universities to do it. It is to provide solutions to specific problems for people who do things. Therefore, the core teaching content of universities is the multi-thinking mode.

Look, I'm right. It's all routine. First, I will label you as a tall "doer", and then I will put forward a new concept of "resilience" to make you feel that this ability is very important and inseparable from it. If you want this ability, you have to pay him RMB. ]

Remember the question we asked at the beginning of this part: Can I see the facts in order to grasp the small trend? Now I can answer this question: Yes, if you master multiple modes of thinking.

Having said that, you can understand why I especially like Fitzgerald's sentence: "It is a sign of first-class wisdom that a person can keep two completely opposite ideas at the same time and act normally."

[This sales promotion is well done, and the touch-up is silent. Unfortunately, you think everyone else is a fool. Those who came to the scene paid the tickets, and those who didn't come to the scene took the time to listen to your New Year speech. We are not here to listen to your advertisement. Those who sell health care products to the elderly and old ladies don't charge the audience money, but also give small gifts. You are much better than them. Fitzgerald's words are true, but did you pay him for advertising with his words? ]

?

Part IV: Can I perceive "ignorance"?

1

It's strange to hear the word "ignorance". This year, Liang Ning brought this word to me, which is her explanation of what innovation is.

Many people think that not knowing is just fighting against the world, which is wrong. No one will scold anything they see, look at nothing pleasing to the eye, and want to deny everything. That is not "ignorance", that is "anti-knowledge". Anti-knowledge growth is self-destructive to mankind. How can this be innovation?

Liang Ning's non-knowledge is a much more subtle concept. It was in the knowledge of the original society that I suddenly had a different idea from you. That moment is a bit like the moment when a child leaves his mother and is born. The feeling of the child is that he was rejected by his mother at this moment and came to a lonely and cold world. The pressure he felt made him cry loudly. But soon, he will be hugged by his mother. Therefore, this is a complete and continuous connection between the two processes. From being rejected to being recognized, from being divorced from * * * knowledge to recreating * * * knowledge. The whole process is called non-knowledge.

[I agree with this view, there is a refreshing feeling. ]

Our generation always feels that innovation is particularly high, or innovative, or shocking the present. Once it appeared, everyone suddenly realized and applauded wildly. But is this really the case? Innovators are often under pressure beyond imagination. Liang Ning said that the process of innovation is a "non-* * knowledge" process, because he wanted to emphasize that it is more difficult to break through the current * * * knowledge and bear the pressure of the current * * * knowledge.

Are we China people stupid? No, it was invented by the ancestors of China people. Just separated by a thick enough paper, I can't expect the light that spans it for thousands of years. Just say, is innovation difficult?

So we must return to the scene of innovation to observe innovation. Only in this way can we feel the real hardship and the shock after the breakthrough. Every innovation, at the moment of its birth, seems to suddenly light up a lamp and light up the night.

[It is precisely because innovation is difficult that innovation is valuable. Today, the so-called "innovations" emerge one after another, and the flooding is almost catastrophic. But how many innovations are really valuable for human development? Only innovation recognized by history is truly valuable and can be called real "innovation". ]

2

A few years later, when the App was initially recognized by the market, I learned two things: one was an innovative idea, and even my parents thought it was a monster at the moment it appeared; Second, if it is not accepted by society later, it is really a monster. The combination of these two logics is what Liang Ning called "non-knowledge".

Douglas Adams, a British science fiction writer, is the author of A Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. He has a saying called "Three Laws of Science and Technology": "Any science and technology that existed when I was born is part of the primitive order of the ordinary world. Any technology born between the ages of 15-35 is a revolutionary product and will change the world. Any technology born after I was 35 years old is against the laws of nature and will be condemned by God. "

He always talks about his products and never leaves his line of work. We are here to listen to you talk about the overall situation of the country, the overall situation of the world, the overall situation of business and the overall situation of development, not to listen to you publicize your products over and over again. This time, Douglas Adams was invited to advertise. Can you equate the products you get with the revolutionary products that people say can change the world? You have repeatedly emphasized the commercial positioning of your products. Commerce is only a part of the service industry, and the service industry is only the tertiary industry. Business may change people's lives, but it can't decide people's lives. ]

three

The next question is coming: how to realize and discover ignorance?

Liang Ning once said something that made me think deeply for a long time: Ignorance never opposes anything, it just presents what is ignored.

【 Finally came an eye-catching picture. ]

Seemingly whimsical, behind it is the potential demand that has always existed but has been ignored; It doesn't look like * * * knowledge, but what new things are they as long as you go back to people's hearts and history? Obviously, they have been there all the time. Non-knowledge comes from deeper knowledge.

[Isn't deeper knowledge the bottom desire of people? Isn't it the current business model to tap people's desires, awaken people's desires, satisfy people's desires, make money by satisfying others' desires, and satisfy their own desires? What's so profound about this? ]

four

20 1 1, wechat appeared. Why is the opening picture of WeChat always like this and never changes? Yes, WeChat is the product of 65.438 billion users. Can't be funny or whimsical. Its boot screen must point to the hometown that everyone agrees with. Is there any other choice besides the earth for the hometown that everyone agrees with?

[If the designer of WeChat chose another picture, I believe Luo Pang will have other explanations. By the way, hasn't the latest version of WeChat been changed? ]

According to the theory invented by two teachers, Huashan and Nanhua, the process of achieving ignorance is a process of "returning to the matrix and strengthening the matrix". Simply put, the so-called innovation is to go back to an old thing, but do it again with brand-new means. The so-called ignorance means that you don't know each other at first sight, and then you realize that you are an old acquaintance.

[This is another pit. Listen down. ]

There are three things that human beings have been excited about, crying for and cheering for since ancient times. That is: celebration, conquest and competition. This is a classic communication theory.

Back to the question just raised: Can I perceive "ignorance"? The essence of this question is, can we innovate? Now we can answer: yes, as long as you have the ability to do those old things again in the latest way. In fact, innovation has always had a stable road. I read this path in the work of jurist Liu Han: "If you don't enter the tradition, you can't add something new."

[Luo Pang started from selling books. Did he go back to his old job? ]