Talk about safety. Mazda is a substitute for Japanese cars. The sense of control is similar to that of European high-end sports cars, and the safety is the best in Japan. Specifically, the safety of Ma 3 is the same as that of Fox. The front and rear 3mm anti-collision steel beams have anti-collision folds and energy absorption areas, and the side door has two anti-side collision beams. Sagitar is 1.5.
Let's talk about the problem of 120Km flying building. This statement is completely fallacious when applied to Ma 3. Mazda's concept of building a car is high rigidity and light weight, which coincides with BMW's concept. It is no exaggeration to say that 160KM on Ma 3 1.6 is not floating at all, but the chassis is relatively heavy and quite stable (personal test). The coupe is not covered by the guarantee.
There are too many people in China who know about cars. They think that as long as German cars are good cars, especially Volkswagen cars, French cars and American trains, Japanese cars and Korean cars are not worth mentioning. This conclusion was established 10 years ago, but today it only shows that these people really don't know anything about cars, their thinking still stays at 10 years ago, and they like to follow the crowd and have no opinions.
All the cars of Dongfeng Citroen have many minor problems, and only those who really have cars know. The handling is ok, but the motivation is not so good. It is suggested that friends with good French cars go to the garage of 4S shop to see the frame and anti-collision beam, and then go to Mazda 4S to see the comparison. See if you can subvert the inherent impression that has been formed in your heart. Anyone who has driven a Mazda knows that its mechanical performance is excellent, and it is only a matter of positioning and publicity. It's still small, but it's really a good car. Mazda sells well in Germany and America.
Say a little more, or answer the question: Ma 3' s 1.6 engine is definitely better than 1.6 Sega; Power horse 3 1.6 is much better than sega 1.6; The fuel consumption of Ma 3 is more economical, and the handling of Ma 3 is better than that of Sega (Sega is also superior, but not the best, only better); Comfortable 2 cars are almost the same, and Ma 3 is tougher; The collision between Ma 3 and Sega is estimated to be a tragedy; Personally, I think the interior of the horse 3 can ignite the passion of driving more.
Hope to adopt!