I have always been an atheist. I'm not here to convince people of superstition. But to prove a fact.
Let me explain the definition of' God' to you first.
"God" must be a fictional character living in the sky? In fact, after continuous research all over the world, in our myth, God is just an alien creature with higher IQ. Let me show you an American experience first!
During World War II, American troops landed on an island in the Pacific Ocean, where some uncivilized aborigines lived. Sometimes, in order to provide logistics support, it is necessary to drop food and medicine by plane. From the air. Later, when American soldiers were needed in the war, they left. Decades later, when foreigners set foot on the island again, they found that the local aborigines made a small plane with bamboo ropes and worshipped it every day, regarding it as a god. Their explanation is that God can fly and land indefinitely. You can live forever without hunting. This example tells us that ancient primitive people saw some creatures with higher IQ but could not come up with any theory to explain the misinterpretation of some bizarre events they saw. Although myths will be misinterpreted in circulation, they must be based on the original works. With the original body, the myth can be misinformed on the original body, and it is definitely not suddenly made up. With the dry historical materials of the Three Kingdoms, this bizarre novel "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" came into being. It is concluded that ancient humans saw alien myths.
Let's begin to refute Darwin's suspicion of "evolution"
An important proposition of the theory of evolution: complex organisms (such as humans) are simple organisms (single-celled organisms and mollusks) that evolve bit by bit, constantly adapt to the environment, and constantly evolve creatures with eyes and noses. Darwin's words
Just the eyes. Evolution can't explain it. Life had no eyes at first, so in order to adapt to the environment, eyes gradually evolved. "The eye has an unparalleled design, which can adjust the focal length, allow different illumination, and correct spherical aberration and chromatic aberration. However, an organ as complex as the eye cannot be completed in one or two generations. It takes many generations to change slowly and finally form. Here, I met a problem. There are so many complicated structures in the eyes, which one should be advanced? If only a part of it has evolved (advanced eyeball or advanced cornea and sclera? And what's the use of relying solely on the late cornea or sclera? Then the eyes still don't work. Isn't that a burden? What is useless in the theory of evolution will not evolve, and even if it exists, it will be eliminated. How can we continue to evolve? There is only one possibility. Perfect eye organs can only grow suddenly. This completely subverts the slow process of evolution.
Evolutionary theory holds that man evolved from apes, that is, before he evolved into an adult, he was not a man, but an ape. Well, there are so many species in the world, and there are countless Qian Qian. Hundreds of millions of years have passed. Why didn't the appearance and nature of crocodiles or crocodiles in the dinosaur period change much? There are fish, frogs, reptiles, mammals and other animals, why not evolve, not from low to high. A cow has been handed down from ancient times and is still a cow. It hasn't stood up and walked upright like human beings, and its mind is full of human-like ideas. Another example is a toad, which was a toad a few years ago. Now, in the past, always. Let's talk about plants. You see, poplars are always poplars, willows are always willows, and peach trees are always peach trees. Have they evolved in Qian Qian for thousands of years? Humans have indeed evolved and changed their genes because of changes in living environment and living habits. However, people are not apes, people are people, and apes are apes. However, they will never be apes. Even comparing their genes is obviously different. This is my personal opinion, which is debatable. (such as chairs) will not appear for many years. Must be created. From this, it is concluded that complex creatures like human beings have not evolved. If it's an ape-man, why aren't there any biological fossils of half-ape and half-man? Why did evolution successfully evolve into human beings overnight? Why are there no creatures between humans and apes, and humans and humans need evolved creatures? They are all people who brush together. This is very contradictory in evolutionary history. It should be that extraterrestrial intelligent creatures directly created people. Commentary: A few days ago, it was reported that American scientists artificially cultivated living hearts. Plus the previous news, the liver and lungs cultivated by Japanese scientists. Sheep cloned in England. The experiment of human cloning in South Korea was terminated by public opinion. Darwin's theory of evolution is full of loopholes. Modern scientists can make mice grow human ears on their backs and clone new life. Why can't people be made by alien intelligence? The so-called god.
Explanation: In the future, people on earth are fully capable of creating a new species (octopoda). How big is the universe? A single galaxy is a disk-shaped star system, which consists of more than 1000 billion stars, thousands of clusters and nebulae. Its diameter is about10,000 light years, and its center thickness is about12,000 light years. There are more than10 billion stars. Is there no life on these planets? No humans? Like the Egyptian pyramids, Bermuda Triangle, Japanese Dragon Triangle, Sanxingdui in China, Shennongjia Savage, Hanging Gardens, Aegean Sun Statue, and so on! Modern science is reducing the manufacture of pyramids, but it is difficult to argue convincingly. How did ancient humans move hundreds of tons of stones? Bora bora's sun idols, they may have higher technology than human beings on earth. It was aliens with higher IQ who created human beings in unison.
So like Darwin's idea, evolution is only a hypothesis of the origin of life, and it is very inaccurate!
The great flood of ancient mythology
Genesis in the Bible says: "Noah and his wife drifted in the flood for 40 days with the ark, and then ran aground on a high mountain. In order to find out whether the flood had receded, Noah stood for three times in a row, and he didn't know that the flood had receded until the third pigeon took back the olive branch. According to Babylonian mythology, Bell was angry with the world and decided to send a flood to destroy mankind. In advance, the gods told an old man at the mouth of the river to choose a boat and get everything ready ... The Mayan holy book records: "This is devastating damage ... a big flood ..." According to Indian legend, this summer's flood will destroy mankind, make him ready, and tow his boat to a safe place. Since then, it has become the ancestor of Indians. Chu Ci Tian Wen said, "Hongquan is very deep, so why fill it?" "There are nine places, why graves?" Shan Hai Jing. "Sea Classic" records: "The flood was too big" and "Gun stole the emperor's land to fight the flood."
Why did the ancients fabricate a myth of the great flood? Did the ancients discuss it? One day in ancient times, an Egyptian picked up a stone and said, "Hello, are you the Maya of America?"? After discussing with Europeans and Asians, we decided to fabricate a myth that floods will destroy mankind together. The story is like this ... ". The Mayans said, "Great. That's a good idea. Let's fix it. You can contact the aborigines in Australia again. "
We can simply draw the following conclusion: 1. Species depend on genes, but genes don't evolve at all. Different individuals will have different genetic codes, but the differences will never go beyond the scope of species. The descendants of tigers will always be tigers, and no lions will be born, even though they are all cats. Although the genes of humans and chimpanzees are very similar, it is said that they are 99% similar, but that one percent is absolutely impossible to cross species boundaries.
2. What "evolved" naturally is actually an occasional "cross-species" alien (such as a two-headed snake), which is rare in a hundred years, and most of them are extremely fragile and belong to inferior products. Reality will not "evolve" into a perfect alien like Godzilla. What's more, there are few aliens who don't meet in a hundred years, and even fewer can reproduce. Even the mules artificially cultivated consciously can't produce small mules now! What's more, accidents in nature.
3. "Aliens" that can reproduce (evolution) must appear at the same time, and there must be a considerable number (and a male and a female) in the same place to reproduce. That is to say, a male deer that occasionally evolves into a neck must find a female deer with the same degree of evolution in its lifetime to "evolve". In order to ensure that future generations will not "die prematurely" due to gene mutation, at the same time,
4. In the process of evolution, the fossils of "intermediate" species are almost blank. Don't tell me that "Beijingers" are human beings, and they are simply extinct apes! And there is nothing to prove that "Beijingers" have created any civilization that conforms to human IQ. Has anyone seen the fossil of a half-nosed elephant? Or a giraffe fossil with half a neck? Or did trilobites evolve into middle fossils of fish? In the theory of evolution, animals evolve layer by layer, so the fossils of species faults should be all over the world. It happened that fossils have no intermediate links! Fossils show that species are independent and irrelevant! This is an evolutionary mistake! Do we believe in the hypothesis of evolution and ignore the tangible fossils? Moreover, early creatures (such as dinosaurs) have nothing to do with modern creatures. Because the earth has experienced several glacial extinctions, except for a few plants, animals are basically extinct, which greatly shortens the cycle of each "evolution". After each extinction, from the perspective of evolution+probability transformation, the emergence of new creatures must be hundreds of millions of years later, and the earth should have died for hundreds of millions of years: it is a miracle that new creatures do not die (because there is no food), and it takes hundreds of millions of years to evolve new races, and it will take several years to spread all over the world. The above is just a lucky species. There will be a process from scratch to more species. But the reality is that in a very short time after the earth's recovery, a large number of new creatures (thousands of species) miraculously "suddenly appeared together"-fossils as evidence!
6. If the theory of evolution is true and evolves layer by layer, then there should be no fixed species in the world. It should be very vague between species, and the world is full of specious things. We should see different forms from tadpoles to frogs, and the people around us are full of various forms from monkeys to people: much like monkeys, a little like monkeys; Very human, a little human, because evolution is accidental, not at the same starting line, some people will evolve faster, and some people will almost evolve. That's what Hitler thought. How can 6 billion humans evolve together? No one with a long tail looks like a monkey, and no one continues to evolve. Who controls the evolution of mankind?
7. The evolutionary convergence of the same species is incredible because they live in different environments. According to the theory that the environment changes species, the species in the equator should be similar, and the species in the Arctic should be similar, and the environment determines everything. But on the contrary, dogs on the equator must be like dogs on the North Pole, not monkeys on the equator. Today, human beings are all over the world. Supposedly, influenced by the environment, there should be great physiological differences between nations, right? However, people of all races walk upright with two eyes and one mouth. Even in different environments, the physical signs are basically the same, but the skin color is different, and this difference in skin color has nothing to do with the environment: whites once drove tropical blacks to the temperate zone to be slaves, and blacks who have not been integrated by blood have been black for hundreds of years, and they will never evolve into white skin by themselves because they arrived in the temperate zone, which is absolutely different from changing species by the environment.
8. According to the theory of evolution, species change with the change of environment, evolve according to needs, and take what they need. However, the human brain is a special case, and the poor will never use what they have learned 1%. Even if you live to be a thousand years old and become a scholar, you won't need one-tenth of your brain. The human brain, however, has only half a life span. What about the other half? Didn't it evolve as much as you use it? That half brain is neither needed nor wanted by human beings. Humans don't need it at all. How can it appear out of thin air and "evolve" so well without any exercise? Moreover, this half of the brain has never been used by humans, and there is no sign of "degradation" for thousands of generations, and it is as good as the other half. How does evolution explain it? The scientific attitude is seeking truth from facts, and the theory of evolution can't give any convincing explanation for the origin of species today. On the contrary, with the progress of science, its theory becomes more and more absurd. Newton was a Christian, but one of his best friends never believed in the existence of God. It is said that he once visited Newton's house and saw a beautiful model of the solar system. As long as you shake the crank, the planets will run in their orbits. He played with it for a long time and couldn't put it down. He asked Newton who designed and made the model. I don't want Newton to casually say, "Nobody." His friend is puzzled: "How can there be no one?" Newton asked: "If a model must be designed and manufactured by someone, why is the actual solar system like this model formed by accidental collision without a designer or creator?" My friend was speechless for a moment, suddenly woke up and accepted theism. We know that every biological organ needs all kinds of appropriate and completely accurate cooperation to play its normal physiological function. The structure and function of the simplest cell are extremely complicated. The complexity and mystery of the physiological structure and function of the eyes are even more unimaginable. Darwin himself was quite puzzled at the time. In the section "Extremely Perfect and Complex Organs" of Chapter 6 "Theoretical Problems" of the Origin of Species, he wrote bluntly: "The eyes have unparalleled design to adjust the focal length, allow different lighting and correct spherical aberration and chromatic aberration. I frankly admit that the hypothesis that the eyes are formed by natural selection seems to be the most ridiculous. " He later said frankly: "So far, every time I think of my eyes, I feel shocked."
Modern medicine tells us that bones are the main organs for hematopoiesis. There are a large number of stem cells in bone marrow, which have stronger activity of division and differentiation than somatic cells, and always remain in embryonic state. Therefore, it is the best material for cloning. This is the real reason why many researchers are working hard on embryonic stem cell research. Modern medicine has proved that the ability and speed of automatic healing of broken tendons are the fastest among all bones in the human body. This phenomenon shows that stem cells in ribs may have the strongest activity of division and differentiation in all other bones. There is no doubt that this is the best biological cloning technology. 1929, Chinese geologist and paleontologist Professor Pei Wenzhong and Doctor unearthed the skull fragment of the first Peking man, which caused a sensation in the world. Claiming to be a human ancestor 400,000-700,000 years ago. In fact, all they found were some skull and jaw fragments and some teeth, which were smaller than those of modern people. However, no other bones of the trunk and limbs were found. They also found the skulls of monkeys, other animals and modern people who were crushed to death by the mine collapse. Now they only find a skull and some broken bones. If we want to prove that these bone fragments are the bones of the whole person and the bones of the so-called "Beijingers" with a long history, this research method and means have no biological and medical statistical significance in science; Don't say evidence, even the inference doesn't hold water. What is even more puzzling is that during the period of 194 1- 1945, "Beijingers" disappeared mysteriously. So far, many scholars have investigated the reasons, but there is no result. Some people say that Pei Wenzhong did a "good thing". Because during the Second World War, when Japan invaded China, the Japanese didn't interfere, stop or destroy any further excavation of Zhoukoudian site at all, and they were not interested in it. In the history of science, it is not uncommon for scientific swindlers to do "good things" for fame and status. Before that, there were many scientific scams in paleontology, such as Neanderthals, Javanese, piltdown man, Nebraskans, lamas and apes, which set a very good example for future generations in scientific research. 1943, after studying this, Professor Flantz Dunrui Wei, a famous anatomist and paleontologist at Frankfurt University, publicly exposed the "Peking Man" scam: "The mystery of Peking Man's skeleton disappearance is entirely caused by Pei Wenzhong, so as to destroy the evidence of the scam forever." In fact, these so-called "Peking man" bone fragments are genuine monkey bones, which have nothing to do with human bones. Professor Ma Shilin Buller, a famous French geologist, paleontologist and anthropologist, left angrily after seeing the photos, broken bones and plaster models left at the beginning, and said to the person in charge who invited him, "Do you want me to cross the ocean and go halfway around the world to see this pile of monkey bones with my head smashed?" Dr. Colin Groves, a famous anthropologist from Australian National University, said after studying this: "Beijingers are not just' bad science', but a complete scientific scam."