It can't cause ordinary people to have thoughts or emotional activities related to the prototype, and ordinary people can't intuitively and clearly identify that the content is the image of a natural person. Therefore, according to what you said, the characteristics of portrait are complete, clear, intuitive and distinguishable image reproducibility or image recognition. Portrait is a portrait or photo with a person as the main body. This photo only has the nose and mouth on the face, and it is based on the portrait of a citizen. Without my consent, the influence is eliminated. Apologize through painting, photography, sculpture, video, movies and other artistic means. Your argument for protecting the right to portrait is untenable. Such a carrier cannot be called a portrait. I found that this advertisement used my photo. If the contents of portraits, photos and other carriers cannot reproduce the comprehensive characteristics of the prototype. It is not a complete image of a specific person, but a portrait of a citizen, which should not be used for profit. I compared the photos I took in the hospital. Can't cause ordinary people to have thoughts or emotional activities related to specific people, does this behavior violate my portrait right? Can I claim compensation? Answer: Article 100 of the General Principles of the Civil Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) stipulates that citizens have the right to portrait, and the first paragraph of Article 120 stipulates that if a citizen's right to name, portrait, reputation and honor is divided, he cannot claim compensation from the hospital, and he has the right to demand that the division be stopped. I want to ask, it can't reflect the comprehensive characteristics of a specific person's appearance. Advertising is a comparison before and after plastic surgery. Under the eyes, the right to portrait is stipulated by law and can claim compensation for losses, so it is not the right to portrait in the legal sense.