The most dissatisfied point
Changan Suzuki antelope originated in Japan in the 1980s. Classical appearance, monotonous interior and unsatisfactory comfort. Although the lamb was wronged a little, the engine noise was a little loud, the idle speed was a little unstable, the exhaust pipe of the new car was rusty, and the steering wheel was unstable after running for eighty or ninety yards. Everyone else is fine. Cars at this price are enough.
The front row space is ok, the head space is a little depressing, and the smaller one in the back row can take three seats, which is a little crowded, the wheelbase is too short, the leg space is relatively small, and the long-distance ride is more uncomfortable. The overall width of this car is too narrow. When two fat people are in the front row, their arms can easily touch each other. It is really hot in summer.
The engine of power G 13B has been redesigned many times, and the gap is not a little bit from the Japanese original assembly machine in the early stage to the Jiangling machine which is basically completely localized now. Excessive idle jitter may be closely related to the change of fuel system suppliers. There is a big gap between the previous Japanese Denso and the current United Electronics. But when running, the power is good at low speed and slightly weak at high speed in the later period. The biggest advantage of this engine is that it is not picky about food, durable leather and reliable performance. The gear ratio of the gearbox is too loose, and the gear is not easy to hang, or it may not run well with the new car, which is related to the power connection.
Control because the car I bought didn't help, and it was slightly heavier at low speed. The direction is fine after starting, and the rear suspension is a connecting rod. When it is too small, it is very helpful to restrain the roll. Low-speed over-damped belt, too many overbearing rear wheel suspension, although it is multi-link, but Changan debugging has some minor problems, and the overall comfort is not good. I hope that the subsequent modified models can be improved.
The mileage of fuel consumption is still relatively small, and the visual inspection is 6 oil. This fuel consumption is acceptable for vehicles in the running-in period. The biggest advantage of antelope is its low fuel consumption. I believe that there will be satisfactory results except the running-in period. This car is highly recommended by friends. His antelope was bought in 2002 and ran more than 300,000 without major repair. It has six oils per 100 kilometers, which is really super fuel-efficient. This is unacceptable.
The elastic deviation of comfortable seat and small lateral space have great influence on comfort. The support of sponge is too low, and it is easy to get tired after riding for a long time. The sound insulation effect of vehicles is very poor. After 60 yards, all kinds of abnormal noise, wind dryness and tire noise followed. What a noise. .
The appearance is basically eye-catching. Although the retro products in the 1980s have undergone many facelifts, they have basically maintained their retro appearance. Although they are not the first beauties, I still like them very much. I will modify my antelope to show different characteristics in the future. Anyway, people of different shapes have different opinions, which I think is ok.
The center console is filled with black and gray plastic inside. Although it feels cheap to knock, this is not the selling point of antelope. Fuel saving, durability and reliable quality are the reasons why it still stands in the automobile market. When the sun is strong, the dashboard is seriously reflective and there are serious problems in color matching. The door panel, central control and all kinds of screws are leaking out, which is really strange for the manufacturer. Isn't it cheap and doesn't need elaborate assembly? This is a matter of attitude. . . . The central control design is super unreasonable. The air conditioning control panel is placed on the top, and the sound adjustment is placed on the bottom. The brain-dead design, adjusting the volume, has to bow its head to move. .
Cost-effective and cost-effective, again, what ordinary people need most is a fuel-efficient and durable car, and they can't ask for too much money. Although there are some minor problems, it is still the most trusted model for ordinary people.