I think the word "high-end" can be used anywhere, but it is simply unreasonable to use it to describe a person's appearance. Characteristics and lack of characteristics are a horizontal comparison, but the word "advanced" is a vertical description. The opposite of high-level is low-level face? There are high and low personalities, and there are high and low social statuses. What is the difference between high and low appearance? I think of this word to comfort some people who have flaws in their appearance or are not confident in their own aesthetics. Whether it conforms to mainstream aesthetics or not, this is just an objective thing, and there is no need to add a lot of subjective judgment to it.

Most of the people who like internet celebrities are relatively young, both male and female, and their education level is generally not particularly high, or their horizons are not that broad. This type of group basically does not pay attention to the things and aesthetics of the fashion industry, and often likes to follow the public. Of course, I’m not saying that not paying attention to the fashion industry means you are low.

Everyone has different interests, concerns, and aesthetics.

Moreover, negative news about Internet celebrities comes out endlessly. Being called Internet celebrity seems to be a mockery and has become a derogatory term. The emergence of the term "high-end face" seems to give another wave of people who look down on Internet celebrities an opportunity to fight back to the extreme.

But as long as we distinguish the difference between the two, it doesn't matter whether it replaces or not. Moreover, there is no formula for high-end faces, but the final market is based on a certain standard and formula set by the public’s thinking. Therefore, high-end faces will become less advanced.