In February 2006, Qingdao Qiyuan Import and Export Co., Ltd., where Wang Wenjie worked, signed a copper mining agreement with Wu Hanzhong, general manager of Shanghai Hangchu Industrial Development Company, and American DANA, agreeing to cooperate in mining Africa Regarding the Zambian copper mine, since Qingdao Company has already paid a certain amount for this project in the early stage, Wu Hanzhong should pay RMB 6.06 million to Qingdao Company in accordance with the contract. At that time, the money was paid by Shanghai Hangchu Company. Because Wu Hanzhong was the general manager of Shanghai Hangchu Company, and the money was remitted via a wire transfer from Shanghai Hangchu Company, and Wu Hanzhong requested that a receipt be written to the Shanghai company, so At that time, there was reason to believe that these amounts were expenses approved by Shanghai Hangchu, and were even projects that Shanghai Company actually participated in.

On March 9, 2006, Shanghai Hangchu signed an agreement with Qingdao Qiyuan to import fuel oil as an agent because it needed to purchase fuel oil. Qingdao Qiyuan helped Shanghai Hangchu as agreed. It found the Russian fuel oil supplier Unocal and signed an import contract with Unocal in its own name according to the agreement. Shanghai Hangchu paid Qingdao Qiyuan Company a deposit of 15 million yuan (including 10 million yuan of bank acceptance draft). . As agreed, Qingdao Company opened a US$8.31 million letter of credit for the purchase of fuel oil from Unocal at China Construction Bank. But later, because Shanghai Hangchu did not recognize the delayed delivery time proposed by Unocal, a dispute broke out between the two parties. Shanghai Hangchu asked Qingdao Company to cancel the contract with the company. Immediately, Qingdao Qiyuan returned 8 million yuan as requested by Shanghai Hangchu (because the two parties still had other business under negotiation at the time, the Shanghai company only requested a return of 8 million yuan).

In September 2006, Shanghai Hangchu suddenly defaulted on its debts, refused to recognize its copper mine cooperation business with Qingdao Qiyuan, and demanded that Qingdao Qiyuan return more than 13 million yuan. In fact, Qingdao Qiyuan only needs to refund 6.21 million at this time. To this end, Qingdao Qiyuan submitted relevant contracts, agreements and receipts to the other party and waited for the other party's audit. Therefore, the 6.21 million has not been refunded for the time being. Since then, the two parties have not discussed the matter in depth and have continued to cooperate on other businesses.

In December 2006, Shanghai Hangchu filed a lawsuit in Shanghai over this ordinary civil dispute! ! !

On May 18, 2007, Wang Wenjie was detained by the Economic Investigation Detachment of Shanghai Pudong Public Security Bureau on suspicion of "fraud" in economic contracts.

Arrested on June 26, 2007.

On November 20, 2008, the Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court sentenced Wang Wenjie to life imprisonment for contract fraud.

On November 4, 2009, the Shanghai Higher People’s Court upheld the original verdict and Wang Wenjie hit Fainted in court

However, there are many questionable aspects of this case, both in terms of the means of handling the case, as well as the process and results:

1'Wenjie was sentenced to contract fraud crime, and the so-called contract is the "Fima Contract". And my husband has never seen this important contract before, let alone signed it! Such a fabricated contract was actually used as evidence?

2 ‘The so-called other evidence is mostly the witness of the person who reported the crime, and the testimony of the witness changes at any time!

3'When Wenjie was sent to the detention center, his mobile phone was detained by the public security organs for three months before it was delivered to Wenjie. However, the text messages were deleted for no reason. All the text messages that could be used as key evidence were missing. fly! !

4'In the second trial, the presiding judge actually skipped the cross-examination process and rudely interrupted Wenjie's lawyer Wei Peng (one of the two defense lawyers) several times to question the evidence and the strong evidence. An unfolding narrative of the evidence. How can Shanghai's justice be fair?

5'In the file, the court's trial staff, the procuratorate's prosecutors, and the lawyers all saw a note approved by someone from the Political and Legal Committee: "Who from the Political and Legal Committee approved the note: hurry up and handle it as soon as possible." Shanghai trial concluded!" How can justice be achieved when state cadres interfere in the judiciary?

6 ‘Why does the leader emphasize that the trial should be concluded in Shanghai? It is precisely because of their guilty conscience! To put it bluntly, even if the case is established, it should be under the jurisdiction of the People's Court of the place where the crime was committed, not Shanghai.