However, as a new automobile enterprise, Li can't avoid automobile quality problems, and there have been many "sensational" shaft-broken spontaneous combustion accidents. However, after each accident, Li responded and produced evidence to prove that the accident had nothing to do with the quality of the car.
Let's listen to Li's views on the recent accident.
The ideal owner broke the news: the A-pillar was broken due to a car accident and the airbag did not bounce off.
Recently on social platforms, one? The owner of Li ONE posted that on the afternoon of September 22nd, 2020 10, he was driving Li ONE at high speed and collided with the tail of the van in front, resulting in the fracture of the A-pillar, and the nose bone of the passenger sitting in the co-pilot position was broken, and the whole face was stitched with 33 stitches. Finally, disfigurement, severe concussion and slight concussion of the rear passengers were judged.
The owner also mentioned that the airbag did not bounce off when this accident occurred, which was somewhat unreasonable.
The shopkeeper also raised three questions:
1. Why didn't the assisted driver recognize the lane change of the vehicle in front?
Second, is the A-pillar of the vehicle that fragile?
Third, where is the protection of vehicles for passengers?
Li responded from a technical point of view.
In response to this matter, some media contacted Li and the official gave a preliminary response.
Aiming at the problem that assisted driving cannot identify the vehicle in front;
Li said, "At present, there are limitations in the identification of vehicles with auxiliary driving changing from the opposite lane to the main lane, and it can't be identified as the main target when it is merged into 1/5 (in this accident, the front vehicle was only merged into 1/5), which is also the limitation of the current level of auxiliary driving. Therefore, L2-level assisted driving is still dominated by people controlling vehicles, or it can't completely replace people to make decisions (assisted by other brands).
Aiming at the problem of why A-pillar is so fragile:
Li said, "According to national standards, there should be a guardrail at the back of the truck, and the position and strength of the guardrail should be sufficient. From the accident video and collision results, the truck did not meet the standard, so the vehicle got into the back of the truck, and the A-pillar of the accident vehicle became the main stress point (the right front longitudinal beam and energy absorption box of the vehicle were not damaged, and even the headlights were not completely broken). A-pillar can't bear such a big impact alone, so it is deformed.
Aiming at the problem that the automobile airbag does not pop up;
According to Li, the A-pillar doesn't have a separate sensor, so the airbag won't pop up (the vehicle collision sensor is generally arranged at the collision beam of the front bumper, as are other vehicles, and the A-pillar doesn't have a separate sensor. )"。
The owner's statement is that when he asked Li's staff why the airbag didn't pop up, Li's answer was "because the hit place is not the point".
A brief comment on people's livelihood of automobiles. com
After the Li No.1 car accident, Li also responded to some questions from car owners, netizens and the media. Whether it is right or wrong, there is no comment here.
What this website wants to say is that Li will respond in time after every accident, especially in the face of online rumors and media attention, which is really commendable.
On the contrary, some car manufacturers turned a deaf ear to the events that the quality problems are constantly fermenting and the society is more concerned, and did not give any explanation, which really hurt the public's heart.
This is an extremely irresponsible performance that ignores public concerns.
The success or failure of automobile products depends on the public. Once they leave consumers, even the best products will not be on the table. Therefore, when automobile products encounter quality problems and attract the attention of the general public, automobile brands should stand up and respond or explain the situation, and the automobile brands that adopt the way of "covering up the problems" without any explanation can only explain that the problems are more serious than expected. Dare not speak is proof.
The public's right to know needs to be maintained. In this regard, on the one hand, we need self-discipline of automobile brands, on the other hand, we also need to introduce relevant measures and regulations.
What do you think of this problem?
This article comes from car home, the author of the car manufacturer, and does not represent car home's position.