Current location - Plastic Surgery and Aesthetics Network - Plastic surgery and beauty - Is auricular cartilage or rib better for rhinoplasty?
Is auricular cartilage or rib better for rhinoplasty?
Hello, autologous cartilage will be absorbed, and the amount of absorption depends on the individual's physique. Most doctors will consider this factor before rhinoplasty, so they can maintain a good state after absorption.

To be exquisite and beautiful, it is very important to shape the tip of the nose. Ear cartilage is the best choice for shaping a beautiful nose tip. It is a common way to shape the back of nose with prosthesis and the tip of nose with auricular cartilage. The back of the nose is very high, the tip of the nose is very delicate and the feel is very real. Moreover, the incision of auricular cartilage is relatively hidden. However, the amount of ear cartilage is small, and it can only shape the tip of the nose, which is not very friendly to girls with poor nasal foundation. The costal cartilage is abundant, and the costal cartilage material is rich, so there is no need to worry about insufficient use, and it has good support and strong plasticity. As cartilage tissue, costal cartilage has sufficient hardness. Costal cartilage has many functions, which can not only shape a tall nose and a stable tip, but also prolong the nose and support the columella. It is the best choice for nose with poor foundation and high bridge of nose!

Five excellent seamless semi-rib nose, using the fourth generation rhinoplasty technology, that is, completely through the incision hidden in the nasal cavity, to complete the construction of nasal tip costal cartilage scaffold and the correction of nasal bone deformities such as nasal height, nasal width and nasal deviation.

On the one hand, the incision is hidden in the nasal cavity, and no surgical traces can be seen outside after suture removal; On the other hand, because the operation is carried out directly from mucosa to subperiosteal, the original blood supply and lymphatic circulation of the nasal tip are not destroyed, and the original soft tissue anatomical structure of the nasal tip is preserved as much as possible, so the overall swelling period and proliferative period are obviously shortened by more than 60% compared with the original complete incision technique.