The fact that Angelababy (Angelababy, hereinafter referred to as AB) came to our hospital has aroused widespread public concern. Afterwards, many people questioned the treatment results and even publicly accused me of being "unrealistic". In this regard, I think it is necessary to express some of my views through the media and clarify the misunderstanding.
First of all, what I did for AB this time was not a "cosmetic appraisal", but a consultation. As an attending doctor, I have never issued any "appraisal report". As for the content, only my outpatient medical record has two and a half pages. The version of medical records circulating on the Internet is only one and a half pages, which is not comprehensive.
Secondly, some people question whether there is a difference between "identification" and "seeing a doctor". The answer is yes, there is a difference between "identification" and "seeing a doctor". "Appraisal" shall be determined by a special appraisal institution after organizing experts to check and discuss, and the appraisal results shall be given; And "seeing a doctor" is a medical record written and signed by a doctor. Moreover, it should be emphasized that any doctor's diagnosis is not authoritative.
Third, about "whether minimally invasive plastic surgery belongs to cosmetic surgery". AB to hang up my specialist outpatient number is to follow the normal medical treatment process. As a doctor, I have no reason to refuse anyone's request for medical treatment.
AB's main complaint is: 1, check whether the forehead is plastic surgery and whether there are implants; 2. Check whether you have done rhinoplasty; 3. Check whether you have done eye cosmetic surgery; 4. Check whether you have had facial contour plastic surgery. I examine the patient's chief complaint, including the necessary X-ray examination. My conclusion is that there is no trace of operation in the above part. This is a very rigorous conclusion. In this regard, some people report that the appraisal result is "no cosmetic surgery", which is only their understanding of the conclusion I gave, and also their expression and understanding. As a professional, I have never said such a thing.
As for "injection of botulinum toxin and hyaluronic acid", are these "micro-plastic surgery" considered cosmetic surgery? These examination items were not involved in this visit. AB didn't ask for them. The doctor didn't check them and there was no way to check them. They were not reflected in the visit records. There is a misunderstanding among the public.
Finally, a young doctor sent a message, questioning the extraction of four first pair of fangs, apparently after anterior alveolar osteotomy, accusing me of being unrealistic. In this regard, I suggest that such words should never be said again. This is a sign of ignorance. AB admitted that he had orthodontics and pulled out his teeth for meiosis, which is common sense. The CT film of AB shows that the alveolar bone of the maxilla and maxilla is continuous, without steps or fixation marks, and the cortical bone is smooth. It is true that no operation has been performed. We can see CT films from the Internet. Whether orthodontics is cosmetic is an academic debate. So far, the medical community has not reached a clear conclusion. Is it beside the point to discuss this topic?