Question 1: Why can't men have children? First of all, I can tell you clearly that the history that men can have children and men can't have children has become a thing of the past. Chen Huanran, a plastic surgeon at the Union Medical College Hospital affiliated to China Medical College, said: "The development of medicine is advancing by leaps and bounds. Judging from the current medical level, it is entirely possible for men to have children. " Chen Huanran has another identity-a plastic surgeon in the first gender reshaping center in Asia, helping some patients with gender confusion to re-establish their gender. Modern medical means are enough to make transsexual surgery fake, but for many transsexuals who change from men to women, there is still a big problem-although they have a woman's name, they cannot have a woman's fertility. Many transsexuals treated in Chen Huanran in the past (male to female, hereinafter referred to as the same) divorced their husbands because they could not have children after marriage. This made Chen Huanran start thinking about how to make these transsexuals truly become a complete woman. Professor Winston, a famous British medical expert, also mentioned his view on the possibility of male having children in his book "In vitro fertilization revolution"-"Male pregnancy is actually just like female ectopic pregnancy, which is absolutely possible. Doctors can use advanced technology to transplant embryos into male abdomen; When the embryo is mature, the baby will be born by caesarean section. Because the placenta itself has the hormones needed to give birth to the fetus, it does not have to develop in women. " Chen Huanran summarized the specific operation process into five steps through preliminary research: First, take an egg and inseminate it in vitro. Second, when the fertilized egg divides to a certain extent, the embryo is placed in a specific part of the man's abdominal cavity and pregnancy begins. Third, supplement estrogen and progesterone to the "quasi-male mother" through the catheter. Fourth, after six or seven months of pregnancy, the "male mother" will be delivered by caesarean section. Fifth, finally put the fetus in an incubator. The key problem to be solved Judging from the technology that human beings have mastered, most technologies from one end to the other have been solved. Specifically, at present, IVF is a relatively mature technology, and the third generation of IVF has been produced in China. Therefore, the first step for a man to have a baby-taking * * and eggs, then cultivating them into embryos and implanting them in his mother's body, is very likely to be successfully completed. And the last step is not a problem. Because a man's abdominal muscle pressure will hinder the baby's growth, so the pregnant fetus must not be full-term, and the current technology can save the fetus as long as it exceeds 28 weeks. Therefore, it is not a big problem to have a caesarean section after the man is pregnant for 6-7 months, as long as he can stop bleeding successfully. The key problem now lies in the intermediate link. The first is how to find a place where embryos can grow and develop in a man's abdominal cavity and simulate an environment suitable for pregnant women. It must have four requirements: rich blood and nutrients; There should be a certain space to facilitate the growth of the fetus; There should be no important blood vessels, nerves and organs around to avoid being oppressed by the fetus; It is also easy to take out by caesarean section. Secondly, there are many unknown variables to solve the monitoring problem of hormone supplementation for "prospective male and female", which is difficult to grasp. Another thing that must be taken into account is that estrogen supplementation may lead to male breasts or * * * *, which is a problem that needs to be solved after the birth of the fetus. According to Dr. Chen Huanran, foreign experts have done a lot of relevant research on these two points and provided abundant information. We are fully capable of solving these problems. Within ten years, it will definitely become a reality for men to have children. Dr. Chen Huanran emphasized that at the beginning of 2002, Dr. Liu Hongqing, a Chinese scientist from Cornell University Reproductive Medicine and Infertility Research Center, used tissue engineering technology to reconstruct human endometrium in vitro for the first time in the world. This in vitro reconstructed endometrium is not only identical to human endometrium in tissue structure, but also similar in function. Artificial endometrium not only provides intellectual support for the topic of "male pregnancy", but scientists also have a bolder idea-in the future, artificial uterus can be developed without human body, and an "artificial uterus factory" similar to the * * * library can be established. One day in the future, a couple who want to have children just need to ask a doctor to take out * * * and eggs from their own bodies and put them in a "workshop" of an "artificial uterus factory". The pain of pregnancy in 10 will become a quiet wait, and they can get back their own flesh and blood. In Chen Huanran's view, it is better for a person to have children than for a machine to have children. One day, one of your male colleagues will tell you that he has gone on maternity leave. What about you ... >>

Question 2: Why can't men have children? What can a woman do if a man gives birth to a child? Nonsense.

Question 3: Why can't men have children? Men can't have children because of their physical structure, and women can't have children without men.

Question 4: Why can't men have children? The first man has no uterus to give birth, and the second one, if the same woman can give birth from * * *, where will the man give birth? So men can't have children!

Question 5: Why can't men have children? Men can also have children. How can a man fertilize a woman without * * *? If you mean that a man is going to have a baby, you can have sex-change surgery in a scientific way.

Question 6: Why can't boys have children? Because the reproductive organs are different.

But if you have sex-change surgery,

You can still have children.

Question 7: How do men have children? The experiment of "men give birth to children"

king

Finally, someone is ready to carry out the experiment of men having children.

We only heard that this possibility exists in theory before. The reasons for supporting this experiment are as follows: first, it can satisfy the desire of transgender people to have children; Second, some men can satisfy their desire to help their wives avoid the pain of childbirth; Third, "this is unprecedented, and it is a sophisticated technology that can attract the attention of the whole world" (Meng, commentator of Southern Metropolis Daily); Fourth, even Americans can't do this technology or have no time to do it. This is "what we China people have to do ourselves" (in Meng Bo) ...

Can transgender people extend their right to have children by wanting their own children? It depends on the nature of men's children, not the other way around ―― as long as a person wants his own children, he can have his own children. Western advocates of human cloning also believe that a person can clone himself as long as he wants. If he agreed with this logic, there would be no law prohibiting human cloning. Desire cannot naturally become a right. Similarly, people who want to relieve the pain of childbirth for their wives cannot naturally extend similar wishes to the source of legality or rationality of something. However, it is obvious that in many people's minds, there is an extreme individualistic value judgment, as long as it is what they want or need, they should be satisfied.

Whether a man can have children involves not only whether we should respect life, but also whether we should respect nature. Of course, the modernization of the west has always been a road of "convincing nature with reason" (in Aikai's words). On the issue of men having children, we also see this way of thinking: men's bodies are natural substances, and giving birth to children is a natural phenomenon. We use high technology to transform this nature, that is, "good reason." Why not? However, this "legitimacy of modernization" is also restricted by many factors in the western cultural environment, and in recent years, with the increasing destruction of ecology, it has encountered unprecedented doubts and opposition. Even if we think according to the logic that utilitarians like, there is still a question of whether the income is greater than the expenditure. In fact, the consequences of changing nature may be far beyond our expectation and control.

What's more, it is generally believed that life has a value beyond nature? What's more, human life enjoys supreme status? All medicine has always adhered to the principle of "saving the wounded and saving the dying", that is, to overcome natural defects. However, the so-called "men have children" project is essentially to change the ecological environment of human life. Whether the project is technically feasible or not, the key is that the consequences of changing the human reproductive ecology are likely to exceed our imagination. Up to now, many human laws and norms are based on the natural division of labor between the sexes, and have constructed human psychology and culture. For example, our order and morality will be greatly rewritten; For another example, poetry about fertility will probably only be produced in this natural situation. Once science and technology intervene and life becomes a finished product, our inherent sacred experience will be gone. The abuse of technology will lead to the loss of meaning, and the seriousness of meaning loss to human beings cannot be overestimated.

As for the so-called "this is unprecedented", "this is sophisticated technology", "it will attract the attention of the whole world" and "this is China people's own business", it is not an internal standard to evaluate a thing. Some people in Russia want to blow up the moon, which is also "unprecedented" and will also use "high-tech" technology, which will also attract the attention of the whole world. So what? Can we do that? As for the idea of being one step ahead of Americans in doing something and showing off in the world or showing off in the world, it is even more strange. Much like the current ethos of "as long as you are sensational, you are not afraid of stupid moves", which has nothing to do with the scientific spirit. And the emotions such as patriotism implied in it are also redundant.

People who are going to carry out the experiment of "men have children" realize that this so-called project will encounter legal problems, so they have prepared a team of legal advisers. In view of their arrangement, relevant parties should legislate to prohibit this kind of experiment ―― you know, necessary conservatism and necessary backwardness will gradually become a virtue of our times. ...& gt& gt

Question 8: Why can't boys have children? If boys can have children, it has nothing to do with your woman.

Question 9: Why don't men have children? The physiological structure determines that eggs cannot be produced without ovaries, and there is no place for babies to live without uterus, as simple as that.