How do celebrity endorsements divide responsibilities? What do you think in the modern society where people's awareness of rights protection is gradually clear? Should celebrity endorsements take responsibility? Everyone expressed their views on this issue. So, is there a clear definition of this kind of thing in law?
In fact, Article 28 of the Advertising Law has relevant provisions. First of all, it is stipulated that the spokesperson's endorsement should be based on facts and conform to the regulations. In fact, unused products should not be recommended. Article 56 also shows that if false advertisements endorsed by spokespersons cause damage to consumers' rights and interests, both advertising spokespersons and advertisers should bear corresponding responsibilities.
In fact, at this point, everyone should basically understand, right Celebrity endorsements must be responsible for the goods they endorse. Moreover, even if the endorsement period is exceeded, as long as there is a problem with the goods endorsed by the star, even if the star no longer speaks, he still needs to bear legal responsibility.
It is actually a very common business marketing model for merchants to use the star effect to advertise their products. In fact, it is mainly to use fans' love and trust in Aidou to encourage fans to buy goods and increase sales and fame; And stars can also improve their popularity through commodity endorsement; It is a win-win business mechanism for stars and businesses.