1, it should be free. According to the provisions of the Administrative Enforcement Law, the storage expenses arising from the seizure and detention measures shall be borne by the administrative organ. 2. However, in practice, some administrative organs have agreed with a third party that the sky-high storage fee shall be borne by the parties to the seized property, which seriously infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of the administrative counterpart. 3. According to Article 26 of the Administrative Enforcement Law, "the administrative organ shall properly keep the places, facilities or property that have been sealed up or detained, and shall not use or damage them; If losses are caused, it shall be liable for compensation. The administrative organ may entrust a third party to keep the sealed place, facility or property, and the third party may not damage it or transfer or dispose of it without authorization. If losses are caused by a third party, the administrative organ shall have the right to recover from the third party after paying in advance. The storage expenses arising from the seizure and detention shall be borne by the administrative organ.