Current location - Plastic Surgery and Aesthetics Network - Plastic surgery and beauty - The hospital involved in the liposuction death of online celebrities was stopped. Which hospital is involved?
The hospital involved in the liposuction death of online celebrities was stopped. Which hospital is involved?
On July 15, the topic of # Internet celebrity died of liposuction, and the hospital was closed down # was posted on the hot search. It is reported that Xiao Ran underwent liposuction and filling surgery in Hangzhou Huayan Medical Beauty Hospital on May 2, and two months later, Xiao Ran died of multiple organ failure due to systemic infection on July 13. At present, the hospital is conducting a fire drill and the consultation is suspended. The online information of the plastic surgery hospital involved has been cancelled.

Tianyancha App shows that the company involved is Hangzhou Huayan Medical Beauty Hospital Co., Ltd., which was established in June of 20 18 with a registered capital of100,000 yuan. The legal representative and suspected actual controller is Zhang Zhiyuan, whose business scope includes medical cosmetology, cosmetic surgery, cosmetic dermatology, cosmetic dentistry and cosmetic Chinese medicine.

Xiao Ran's family members have nine questions about the judgment and treatment of the hospital.

On July 14, the reporter learned that Hangzhou Huayan Medical Beauty Hospital has been closed, but no relevant personnel from the hospital have come forward to communicate with their families about the accident, and the doctor who operated on Xiao Ran has also cancelled his personal Weibo. The reporter called the hospital and has been in a state of no answer.

Xiao Ran's family told reporters that they have nine questions about the hospital's judgment and handling:

1. Misdiagnosis: Xiao Ran should have suffered from acute necrotizing fasciitis or surgical infection leading to shock, and he felt pain after operation. The doctor only treated it as a normal postoperative reaction, giving routine pain relief and symptomatic treatment, and did not report it to the superior doctor in time for timely treatment, which delayed the illness. In addition, Xiao Ran failed to move in time after operation, the drainage was not smooth, and the exudate accumulated under the skin caused infection, which eventually led to septic shock and multiple organ failure. If debridement and treatment were timely,

Second, there was no timely examination: after the problem was discovered, blood analysis, electrolyte and biochemical examination were not reviewed in time, which led to misjudgment of the condition.

Third, the postoperative doctor's advice is not the surgeon himself, and he does not understand the patient's condition. It is not allowed in principle. The doctor didn't realize the infection and kept giving painkillers and sedatives to cover up the illness.

Fourth, is the operation time too long? 12: 40- 17: 40, liposuction 2000ml, pure fat 1500ml, the operation time is too long, resulting in intraoperative infection.

Five, did not record the changes of postoperative condition in time, there is a problem with the writing of medical documents.

6. Is there any problem of iatrogenic infection in the environment and equipment of this hospital? Is the aseptic environment in the operating room up to standard? Does the surgical instrument meet the sterilization requirements? Does the disinfection shop list pass the customs? Does the postoperative dressing room meet the requirements of hospital feeling? Did the doctor pass the aseptic operation?

Seven, a large area of ecchymosis in the operating area, a large area of trauma during the operation, improper operation by the doctor, suggesting that the liposuction level is too shallow and the operation is rough.

Eight, no medical equipment, dressing disinfection qualified monitoring label card.

Nine, the surgical nursing record sheet was marked with an electric knife, but there was no position to stick the electrode plate. In the nursing record, the patient complained of pain many times on May 2-4, and only gave pain relief without any auxiliary examination and treatment.