? Second, it is difficult to change the old Rong Zhi who tried in the first instance, so she must find very important and direct evidence. However, what she provided in the second trial is not enough to prove that she did not participate in these matters. She can only prove from the side that she did not participate in these cases. In fact, these newly provided evidences cannot prove that she did not participate at all.
Old Rong Zhi provided three new evidences:
First, the old girlfriend said that she was not a vain person and wanted to prove from the side that what she did was threatened by France and Britain, but the video evidence was refuted by the prosecution because there were obvious editing traces in the video and could not be used as evidence.
Second, Rong Zhi Sr. didn't resist when he was arrested, but France and Britain understood the resistance when he was arrested, and Rong Zhi Sr. didn't have plastic surgery and didn't want to hide it, but these are not enough to show that Rong Zhi Sr. met the conditions for commutation.
The third is a similar case. The woman in the case is similar to Lao, but sentenced to 12 years.
Although a lot of new evidence has been provided, in fact, none of them can refute the accusation that she did not participate in "intentional homicide"
? To sum up, although after the second trial, the old Rong Zhi overturned many previous confessions, but this has no practical effect. Some things don't exist unless you admit it. If Rong Zhi Sr. surrendered herself in the past 20 years, it means that she was persecuted, and it is still possible to escape the death penalty. But after so many years, she expressed herself with "fear" and "dare not", and no one would believe her. Therefore, the possibility of old Rong Zhi being sentenced to death is basically the same.