In proportion, the number of handsome men is far less than that of ugly men! Assuming that the male playboy rate is fixed, in absolute sense, the probability of being an ugly male playboy is higher. This is consistent with the daily observation of many netizens we have seen on the Internet.

I saw a question before, is it that German taxi drivers wear myopia glasses more or German university professors wear myopia glasses more? It is said that the proportion of myopia among university professors is higher, but obviously the number of taxi drivers is much larger, so in absolute terms, the number of drivers is more nearsighted.

This is a statistical cognitive fallacy. Using the absolute number of two people to infer the relative number ratio, then the conclusion with high probability is wrong.

In addition, there is a reality that beautiful appearance is not a scarce attribute among heterosexual couples that handsome guys are looking for. Beautiful people are always more attracted to each other. So they have a strong immunity to appearance. And they may find more girlfriends, and this immunity will be better.

So handsome guys will pay attention to more scarce attributes, such as personality, collocation, independence and so on.

But wait, do you feel encouraged as an ordinary girl? The reality is not so optimistic. Although handsome men may not value looks so much, it doesn't necessarily mean that ugly women have more opportunities. You know, just because an ugly girl doesn't have looks doesn't mean you have those scarce qualities that handsome guys value! You know, those scarce attributes are also rare in the crowd.

Appearance is hereditary and can be adjusted by micro-shaping, but personality and independence need constant efforts to hone! To tell the truth, it may be harder!

If you think it's good, you can pay attention to "small fire glug": it continues to bring deep, interesting and useful content.