Of course, Liu Haoran's acting skills are flawed. His eyes are not smart enough, and his facial expression is a little stiff and not rich enough. What I know is that Haoran is nearsighted and his eyes are not low. I like some magazines and hard photos, and my eyes are very affectionate and deep. Like obsidian, it is actually lacking in focus and light.
However, Haoran's grasp of the role, in fact, mostly pays attention to a quasi-enough is enough. This is actually very straightforward and rational, so when Haoran plays a role, it often makes you feel that he doesn't work hard and doesn't pay attention to the role, but looking back carefully, you can't pick out the big shortcomings because his potential logic is common. After noble consideration, the interpretation of this role conforms to the logic and fundamental cognition of life, so he is within your understanding. These centers need some very detailed center polishing, very advanced. Nowadays, many actors have no intention to be (young actors), which can be said to be their talent. Many people who deliberately try to figure out the details have the existence of the film emperor.
Compared with Pumbaa's quarrel in the play, his acting is really good. My favorite part is the part where Wei Jinbei said he was an outsider. Pumbaa shivered and put his hand on Wei Jinbei's shoulder, which was the finishing touch. This detail is the best. The other center in the quarrel part, Pumbaa, played steadily, performed well and had a certain degree of relaxation. When he is angry, his eyes are actually very lonely and dim. This is well grasped. Because of Peng Xiubing's analysis at that time, the entanglement and regret for Wei Jinbei was actually greater than resentment, and it was accompanied by Peng Peng's pouting.
Haoran said here, I have to say that Haoran is very smart. As mentioned above, Haoran has considered a lot. In fact, if you look at Haoran's acting skills, you will find that Haoran's lines are too good. Why? One reason is that Haoran's facial expressions are not rich enough, and his eye information is not conveyed enough. If you slap yourself in the face, it's like quarreling with part, and you will feel that he is not performing and still wanting more. So at this time, everyone may concentrate on Haoran's lines. I have to say that his lines are very good. It can be said that Wei Jinbei's shaping and noble lines contributed a lot. A kind of sadness, softness, but with a sense of fragility, but also a tenacious feeling in it, which is very suitable for Wei Jinbei, and his intonation, voice and lines are indeed accurate. He can foster strengths and avoid weaknesses, give full play to his excellent lines and weaken facial expressions. However, I am inclined to his overall shaping of the role. Wei Jinbei, whose facial expression is not rich, likes to squint and hum a cold, and even makes a noise. You mean me, outsider? There is no heartbreaking pain, as long as it is faint fatigue.
Then look at the role of Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties. He played Wei, Jin and North in Liu Haoran, not Wei, Jin and North. Now I think many dramas are looking for the right actors to play this role, but Haoran always likes to stop and rework this role and turn it into XXX played by Liu Haoran. So what is this XXX played by Liu Haoran? Exactly, but so far. Waldler, Qin Feng and Wei, Jin and North, this is his interpretation at this stage. With my excellent height and outstanding face value, plus my lines and point-to-point acting skills, there is no special center, but I can't pick out shortcomings. This is Haoran's consideration and interpretation of some roles that are not suitable for his age and experience when he is in his twenties.
To be honest, Liu Haoran's acting skills have improved. Those who say that Haoran's acting skills are worthless on the internet will only stare blankly, have no aura, have no talent or anything, and can't fully admit it. This is actually similar to writing a composition. Haoran's earliest roles were Huai Yu and Song Ge. Huai Yu can be said to be a natural player. He and Haoran are really similar in personality, and their IP is excellent. Later, when he began to interpret other people's lives, he made a consideration. This is the result of his consideration. Some people think that Haoran's performance is not enough, but it can be better and the light is not accurate enough. What they want is the ultimate and incisive experience.
Just like an expository composition, it should not only have a clear structure and discussion, but also have other things, such as quotations, words, deeper thinking and sublimation of topics or themes, and so on. But as we all know, Haoran is also an ordinary person. He also needs to learn and understand. Besides, he did a good job before. At least I picked up his article, and I knew it was written by him, not only his handwriting, but also my familiarity with his clear writing ideas and accurate grasp of the topic. This alone has defeated many students. Moreover, there are many good compositions. I have read the whole classical Chinese of "Spring Snow". There are some practical examples at the beginning and end of Xialiba people, and there are also O'Henry-style articles, which suddenly sublimate at the end and put forward their own ideas. They are all good model essays in the exam. Can you say that Yangchun Baixue is not empty? Can you say that the article is noble and he doesn't digress? At the same time, getting off at Ba Li is also a good test-taking skill. Thirdly, neat handwriting is always a stepping stone to high-scoring composition, and elegant fonts are like time bombs. Different people have different opinions, which is similar to the actor circle.
At the same time, I also want to say that Haoran's handling of the role is actually quite similar to his life. So far, it gives people a vague and ambiguous feeling, as if he felt something, but it is not realistic. Many actors actually perform better than Haoran, and it is easier for the audience to get into the play and see it incisively and vividly. However, Haoran kept me waiting for him. I am waiting for his whimsy, waiting for his thinking about the role, waiting for what will happen.
I haven't studied acting, and I don't know what a good performance is. If acting online is not difficult, what is good acting? Can you make the audience feel * * *, can you make the audience remember, or can you really integrate into the role? Whether the role suits the actor or the actor adjusts the role gives me a very different feeling. I'm waiting.