Oscar has always preferred literary classics to commercial blockbusters. This is normal. As a highly comprehensive art, film is bound to have profound connotations. This height comes from life, but it is much higher than life. Commercial blockbusters must be for profit, the theme must not be too obscure, and the production must cater to the appetite of the public. Of course, it will not enter the harsh eyes of the Oscar judges. As for commercial blockbusters such as popcorn, they pay attention to rhythm, cool pictures and easy-to-understand plots. So the description of the corresponding person is much weaker. So there will be movies that are applauded and not popular. This is the irreconcilable contradiction between art and market. Therefore, in history, commercial blockbusters rarely win awards with high gold content, and most of them are technical. There are exceptions. The Lord of the Rings won 1 1 Oscars, including the Best Film Award. For commercial films, such a high level and such a high record have never been seen before, and basically there will be no future. There have also been films that are extremely "artistic" but also extremely "box office poison". Citizen Kane, the first classic film in the United States in the last century, was met with a cold reception by the public and the box office was bleak. In the end, he only got nine nominations and failed to win the highest award for best film. This is also a special case.