On February 9, 2008, at 65438, Wang Tengye, an employee of Dongguan Jinlong Jewelry Company, put the box containing gold jewelry worth RMB 3 million next to the trash can at the counter of the waiting hall 19, and went to the counter 22 meters away to inquire about the consignment. Meanwhile, Liang Li, the airport cleaner, took the carton away and took it home privately. Liang Li himself said that when the incident happened, he saw a 50-year-old woman sitting on the basket of a luggage trolley with a child. The latter two and another young woman hurried into the security checkpoint and left. At that time, there was a small carton in the basket of the luggage trolley (that is, the carton involved). After three or four minutes, no one came to pick it up, thinking that the passengers didn't want it, and moved the small carton to their own cleaning cart without asking anyone.

Upon investigation, on the day of the crime 16, my colleague Cao found Liang Li and informed the airport terminal that a passenger had lost his gold and had called the police. At about 0: 00 on the same day/KLOC-8: 00, three police officers who handled the case went to Liang Li's home and showed their work permits to identify themselves. When Liang Li's husband opened the door, the police questioned whether Liang Li brought back the property from the airport according to law. Liang Li denied it. The police advised him for more than 20 minutes. In the process, the police found the carton stored under the bed of Liang Li's living room, and Liang Li was forced to admit that it was lost at the airport. Liang Li was detained in criminal detention that day, and then formally arrested. In mid-March, 2009, the public in Shenzhen submitted a prosecution opinion to the Shenzhen Procuratorate, arguing that Liang Li's behavior was suspected of theft, and the amount was extremely huge. According to the law, if Liang Li's "gold mining" behavior is determined by the judicial organs to constitute theft, she will face a penalty of 10 to life imprisonment.

On September 25, 2009, due to insufficient evidence, Shenzhen Baoan District Procuratorate informed Liang Li that it did not constitute theft, revoked bail pending trial and did not initiate public prosecution. However, the procuratorial organ believes that the case is more in line with the constitutive characteristics of the crime of embezzlement, and according to the principle of "less criminal suspicion", the case is sent back to the public security organ; Whether to sue Liang Li or not is decided by Dongguan Jinlong Jewelry Co., Ltd., the injured party.

Handling result: Mr. Liu, the owner of 3 million gold ornaments in this case and the chairman of Dongguan Jinlong Jewelry Co., Ltd., responded on the 26th: "We never thought about who should be held accountable." Liang Li, a lawyer, said that this means that Liang Li is no longer at risk of being investigated for misappropriation of public funds, and Liang Li is completely free.