tool
Dual focus multi-receiver plasma mass spectrometer (FinniganNeptune model)
The laser ablation spot diameter of 2 13nm ultraviolet laser ablation system can be adjusted between 10 ~ 150 μ m, and the maximum actual laser output power can reach 35J/cm2.
Analytical method
See Table 90.6 for the working parameters of the instrument.
Table 90.6 Receiver configuration table and instrument working parameters for isotope ratio determination (solution sampling and laser ablation sampling)
Note: Take FinniganNeptune dual-focus multi-receiver plasma mass spectrometer as an example.
The stability of the instrument and the reproducibility of analytical data were tested with 200ng/mL JMC475Hf standard solution. The experiment adopts static signal acquisition method and uses NeptuneMC-ICP-MS virtual amplifier technology. After the analyzer collects a set of data at the same time, the software automatically replaces the subsequent amplification circuits in turn. After collecting 9 groups of data, each amplifier circuit is consistent with the original analyzer. This technology can effectively eliminate the isotope ratio error caused by the different gain of Faraday cup receiver and improve the accuracy of isotope ratio determination. The ratio of 176Hf/ 177Hf of JMC475 is adjusted exponentially by179hf/177hfn = 240.7325, and the test result for six consecutive months is (0.28217/. The measured values are completely consistent with those reported in the literature within the error range. This solution test method takes a long time and is not suitable for zircon laser ablation sampling test.
Figure 90. 10 JMC475 solution test within six months
Xu et al. (2004) compared and measured JMC475 solution with integration time of 0. 13 1s without Neptune virtual amplifier. Although the analytical accuracy is decreased, the Hf isotopic composition obtained by two different experimental methods is very consistent. Therefore, the laser ablation test adopts the integration time of 0. 13 1s, without using the virtual amplifier.
176Hf has two allotropes, 176Lu and 176Yb. When measuring the ratio of 176Hf/ 177Hf, these two allotropes must be deducted accurately. The following equation (Chuetal. , 2002) is usually used to deduct the interference of Yb and Lu:
Investigation and analysis technology of resources and environment in the fourth volume of rock mineral analysis
Where: β is the correction coefficient of quality discrimination, β = ln (RM/RT)/ln (Ma/MB); Rm is the ratio actually measured; Rt is the true proportion; M is the isotope mass number.
Using179hf/177hf = 0.7325, the Hf isotope ratio was corrected by exponential normalized mass identification. Using173 Yb/172 Yb =1.35274, the quality discrimination correction of Yb isotope ratio is exponentially normalized. Since the ratio of 176Lu/ 177Hf in zircon is usually less than 0.002, the interference of 176Hf in zircon mainly comes from 176Yb. In the process of zircon laser ablation, the Yb signal is directly measured to calculate the βYb value, and then the average value of βYb during ablation is used for interference correction (Iizuka&Hirata, 2005; Wuetal。 ,2006)。
Due to the rapid erosion of zircon by laser, the stable duration of most zircon analysis signals does not exceed 65438±0min. Therefore, the laser in-situ sampling analysis adopts static measurement mode without Neptune virtual amplifier. Interference correction adopts the above method. In order to compare with the literature values, all the standard zircon test results are standardized and corrected by the Hf isotope ratio of JMC475176 HF/177 HF = 0.282160, and the international standard zircon GJ 1 is used as the external standard for sample determination.
Analysis results of standard zircon
1) temora zircon. Temora zircon is produced in the town of Temora in the Lackland fold belt in southeastern Australia. It is the laboratory standard of Australian National University, and its original rock age is 4 17Ma. Zircon fragments selected from original rocks range from tens to hundreds of μ m. Different zircon fragments are measured by 40μm erosion diameter, and the ratio of 176Hf/ 177Hf is 0.282700 64(2SD, N=22), which varies greatly. The ratio of three measurements of the same zircon fragment is 0.282683±24(2SD). It shows that the ratio of 176Hf/ 177Hf between different zircon fragments varies greatly and is uneven (Figure 90.6438+0 1).
Fig. 90. Test results of11standard zircon Hf isotope La-MC-ICP-MS.
2)GJ 1 zircon. GJ 1 zircon is purchased from jewelers in GEMOC Center of Macquarie University in Australia. It is believed that it is produced in African crystalline granite, and its U-Pb age measured by TIMS is 608Ma. The analysis of major elements and trace elements by CL, BSE, EMP and LA-ICP-MS confirmed that the composition of these zircons was homogeneous (Elhlouetal ., 2006). In this experiment, the standard of GJ 1 zircon was 5mm×5mm×6mm (GEMOC center number GJ 1/53). When the erosion diameter is 55μm, the ratio of 176Hf/ 177Hf is 0.282008 25(2SD, N=26) (see Figure 90. 1 1), which is different from that of Gerdes et al. (2006) (0. Elhlou et al. (2006) reported the value measured by LA-MC-ICP-MS method (0.28201519,2sd) and Gerdes et al. (2006) reported the value measured by separating Hf solution with resin by MC-ICP-MS method (0.28/kloc).
3)FM02 zircon. Zircon FM02, collected from Mingxi, Fujian Province, is a Cenozoic zircon megacryst with a size of 3mm×2mm×3mm, which was formed about 3Ma (Liu Ruoxin, 1992). The ratio of 176Hf/ 177Hf is 0.282967 44(2SD, N=27) when the erosion diameter is 55μm m.. The ratio of 176Hf/ 177Hf obtained under the condition of 30μm diameter is 0.28294 1 6 1 (2sd, N= 12) (see table 90.3 and figure 90.12). The Hf isotope ratios obtained under the two radii are consistent within the error range, but the measurement accuracy decreases under the smaller erosion diameter. This may be due to the increase of erosion depth under high laser energy and small erosion diameter, which leads to greater separation in the erosion process. The measurement results are in the same range as those of Qiu Zhili et al. (2005) on other zircon megacrysts in this area.
refer to
Hu, He, Zhan Xiuchun, et al. 2008. Application of matrix normalization technique in in-situ multielement analysis of zircon by laser ablation-plasma mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry, 36(7):947-953.
Jia Zerong, Zhan Xiuchun, He, et al. 2009. Discussion on determination of multi-elements in garnet by laser ablation-plasma mass spectrometry. Rock and mineral testing, 28 (5): 411-415.
Jia Zerong, Zhan Xiuchun, He, et al. 2009. Detection of various elements in garnet by laser ablation-plasma mass spectrometry combined with normalization method in situ line scanning. Analytical Chemistry, 36(5):653-658.
Li, Liang Xirong, Wei Gangjian, Liu Ying. 2003. Accurate determination of Hf isotopic composition of zircon by LAM-MC-ICP-MS [J]. Geochemistry, (1).
Xie Liewen, Zhang, Zhang, et al. 2008. Simultaneous in-situ determination of U-Pb and Lu-Hf isotopes and trace elements in zircon/baddeleyite [J]. Science Bulletin, 53 (2): 220 -228.
Xu Ping, Wu Fuyuan, Xie Liewen, et al. 2004. U-Pb isotopic dating standard zircon Hf isotope. Science bulletin, 49 (14):1403-1410.
Durrant s f1999. Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: achievements, problems and prospects. American Journal of Spectrum,14 (9):1385-1403
Gao Song, Liu, Yuan Hong, Hartendorf, gunther, Chen, Hu. 2002. Determination of 42 kinds of macroelements and trace elements in USGS and reference material glass by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry [J]. Journal of Geographical Standards Communication: Geographical Standards and Geographical Analysis, 26 (2):18/-.
Gunther, Cousin H, Madzar B, Leopold I. 1997. Calibration of dry aerosol by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry [J]. Journal of Atomic Spectrum Analysis,12 (1):165-170
Analysis of solid samples by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry [J]. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 24 (3): 255-263
Hagrid J. W.1989 Relative Element Response of Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry [J]. Analytical Chemistry, 61(11):1243-1248
Halicza L, Gunther D.2004. Quantitative analysis of silicate by liquid-calibrated LA-ICP-MS [J]. Journal of Analytical Spectra,19 (12):1539-1545.
Jackson S E,Longerich H P,Dunning G R,Fryer B J. 1992。 Application of laser ablation microprobe inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LAM-ICP-MS) in in-situ determination of trace elements in minerals [J]. Canadian mineralogist, 30 (4): 1049- 1064
Wang Wenlin, Wang Wenlin, et al. 2004. Application of laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry in zircon U-Pb chronology [J]. Geochemistry, 2002(2).
Liu Yusheng, Hu Zhichun, Gao, et al. 2008。 In-situ analysis of major and trace elements in anhydrous minerals by LA- ICP-MS without internal standard. Chemical Geology, 257 (1-2): 34-43
Gunther, Jackson, Langridge HP, 1996. Transient signal data acquisition and analyte concentration calculation by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry [J]. Journal of Analytical Spectra, 1 1 (9) :899-904
Norman M.D., Griffin W L, Pearson N J, Gariam O, O'Reilly S Y. 1998。 Quantitative analysis of trace element abundance in glass and minerals: comparison of laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, solution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, proton microprobe and electron microprobe data [J]. Atomic spectrum analysis, 13 (5): 477-482
Pearce N J G,Perkins W T,Fuge R. 1992。 Progress in quantitative and semi-quantitative determination of trace elements in carbonate by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry [J]. Acta Analytical Spectra, 7 (4): 595-598
Perkins W T, pierce N J G, de westgate J a 1997. Development and Calibration Strategy of Laser Ablation ICP-MS: Analysis of Trace Elements in Volcanic Glass Fragments and Sulfide Minerals as an Example [J]. Journal of Geographical Standards and Geographical Analysis, 21(2):175-190
Wu Furong, Yang Yonghui, Xie Liwei, et al. 2006. Standard zircon and Hf isotopic composition of baddeleyite for U-Pb chronology. Geochemistry, 234: 105- 126.
This chapter was written by Zhou Jianxiong (Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences).