There must be a difference between a woman wearing jewelry and not wearing jewelry. This difference is not only due to the temperament of jewelry itself. But also because of the psychological influence of jewelry on people.
Rare things are expensive. Jewelry itself is scarce and expensive, which determines that the identity of jewelry owners is destined to be upper class.
In modern times, the price of silver is much higher than that of aluminum. If you wear an aluminum ring on your hand, you are likely to be laughed at. However, during the Napoleonic period, due to technical limitations, the price of aluminum was much more expensive than that of silver. When Napoleon gave a banquet at the court, all the ministers used silver plates, but only Napoleon used aluminum plates. If you wore an aluminum ring in Napoleon's time, it would be an honor.
Aluminum is still that aluminum, but because of the price reduction. The effect is very different.
Therefore, wearing jewelry affects a woman's temperament and affects a person's psychology.
Nowadays, people are looking for diamonds, but if diamonds are as common as iron, I'm afraid the effect of women wearing diamond rings will be gone.
However, jewelry itself also has a role. The ancients said that people raise jade and jade raises people. Jewelry is not just a psychological factor.
Whether a woman wears jewelry or not depends on other people's opinions. People with different values have different views. For example, many people pursue the Tri-color of Tang Dynasty, and once they know that Tri-color of Tang Dynasty is a funerary object, they will stay away from it. Jewelry is the same, with different opinions and different influences. However, there must be a difference.