There was a rich man in the state of Song. One day, the wall of his house was damaged by heavy rain. His son said, "If you don't fix it, someone will steal it." An old man next door said the same thing. At night, rich people really lost a lot of things at home. The rich man thinks his son is clever, but he suspects that the old man next door stole it.

The above is the fable in Han Feizi. Until today, we can still hear similar stories in real life. However, many different or even opposite situations are also common. When we know things and deal with problems, is there a relationship between the intimacy of feelings and the depth of right and wrong cognition of things? What kind of relationship is it? Please write an article on the topic of "emotional closeness and cognition of things"

Note: 1, the content written must be within the scope of the topic. The allegorical materials quoted in the test questions can be used or not. 2. Self-determination. 3. Style is optional. 4. The topic is self-made. 5, not less than 800 words. 6. Please do not copy.

According to Du, a Chinese teacher in Liaoning Experimental Middle School, the author's original intention is to hint to others that he should pay attention to his relationship with listeners. If the relationship is alienated, even if his opinion is correct, the effect will not be good. This is from the opposite side. If you explain it from the front, it can be extended to: listen to the correct opinions, don't look at who put it forward, and don't be biased against people.

Teacher Du thinks that the difficulty of the test questions is ok, which is basically consistent with the questions that students usually review. The composition exam is still a topic, a fable "A clever son doubts his neighbor".

However, judging from the whole test paper, it is still difficult for students to answer questions compared with previous years, and the answers are not very smooth, and the scores of each question are not easy to get. The topic of the composition is a bit unexpected. However, students still have something to say when answering such questions, and it is not easy to digress.

However, how to be profound and ambitious requires students to think carefully and exert their own strength. The topic of the composition is emotional intimacy and understanding of things. When students answer questions, most people will choose to write argumentative papers. It should be noted that the idea should be delayed, linked with reality, limited to the material beating around the bush, and the idea is not broad enough. Argumentative writing focuses on novel ideas, sufficient arguments and integration with practice. This proposition should be discussed from many angles, and it is more practical to write it in connection with "taking people as relatives and taking people as sages"

According to the usual experience prediction, creative, open-minded, well-founded, profound thinking, fully reflecting the candidate's language ability should get high marks. It is not excluded that good students can get more than 50 points, but I feel that the vast majority of students will not be as conducive to play as last year's "Choice of the Mind" answer, and it is not easy to get high marks.