Finally survived the stage of "China has a quarrel". Later, after reading several issues of frequent debates, the scene was blocked and there were times when the end was torn. The topic of the program is also confined to parents every day, and I feel really uncomfortable, and even almost abandoned "Romance" halfway.
This is really not the "seven tyrants" I loved at the beginning!
This variety show with frequent golden sentences was once criticized by "Do fools drink water after all" and "Are we going to be our most annoying appearance after all?" Is it a bad thing? " I really don't want it to end up as a product of pure entertainment.
After reading the issue of 165438+1October16, Qiba said, I know my favorite one is back!
Debate in this issue: The new technology of Wonderful Planet can make all human brains enjoy knowledge for one second. Do you support it?
Yang Qixin's personality is similar to that of Ali before, and everyone is teasing him. As soon as he stood up, the audience began to jump tickets, which was everyone's joy.
He has always been the most prompted new wonder in the fifth season of The Story of Chipa, but it also means that his persuasiveness in serious argument is much reduced.
1, it is difficult to have a son in a cold door.
Yang Qixin started from "Have you become more knowledgeable today?" Starting from reality, he said that in recent years, the proportion of so-called "poor children" in the number of students enrolled in Tsinghua University has become less and less, and * * * has successfully solved this problem.
Yang Qixin quoted theodore schultz's view of winning the Nobel Prize to prove that when the average education level of society is getting higher and higher, the gap will become smaller and smaller, that is to say, everyone becomes more knowledgeable, and the gap between the rich and the poor in society may gradually become smaller.
Note: The ideas in Yang Qixin's letter are excellent, but the arguments are not very pleasing. It is because of the "cold door" that the fruit of "your son is hard to live" was planted. For example, I was born in a remote town in the northwest of China. I have studied English with various accents in primary school for more than ten years, but I am still dumb. My younger brother, who is ten years younger than me, once asked me in distress why the same word was used by a junior high school teacher.
His views spread from the cross section of society. With the improvement of people's education level, the power of "cold door" has decreased a lot.
Don't reject technology just because it is risky, but embrace it.
From this point of view, Yang Qixin made an ancient-modern analogy and made fun of Qi Fei, a hot spot of success.
The biggest lesson of human civilization is the vigilance of technology and the tolerance of human nature.
The greatest experience of human civilization is the tolerance of technology and the vigilance of human nature.
1 and * * * share the same knowledge, which is ridiculous.
Note: this technology is ridiculous, otherwise it will not appear on the wonderful planet. There is no doubt about this, but Zhao Yingnan's statement is indeed full of loopholes, giving the other party a chance to catch the braid.
Children are not born, but doctors are born. This is Zhao Yingnan's argument. However, with the development of society today, there are many people who have knowledge and knowledge reserves beyond their parents, and parenting education can't just stay at the knowledge level.
2. This technology has greatly destroyed the existing fair pattern and obliterated personal efforts.
Zhao Yingnan's point of view is that cold window studies hard for twelve years. Finally, he enjoyed himself and Tsinghua University was dissolved.
Note: The enjoyment of knowledge is not directly related to the dissolution of Tsinghua, so the argument here is not good. To borrow a sentence from Yang Qixin's letter, "Don't ruin your alma mater for a debate".
When you have all the knowledge, you find that the world is boring, and the unknown is the fun of exploration.
Going home for the New Year, I don't want to watch the Spring Festival Gala. The first thing I did when I entered the door was to find grandma making a robot and grandpa looking up at the stars. Is it scary?
Note: this is indeed the biggest argument of the whole bug.
1. It is called privilege for a few people, and civilization for most people and everyone.
2. The ancient sages' seeking knowledge and exploring problems are the deepest gifts given by God. On the other hand, for us, we can stand on the same starting line and be with the ancient sages. How is this unfair? This is actually our greatest recognition and fairness.
3. Scientific and technological progress brings human freedom.
In 2006, I began to study the direction of artificial intelligence. Before 2006, I spent fifteen years studying English and nine years studying computer technology. In 2006, I spent three months printing the paper I read, which was consistent with my height. What did I achieve? I did it. In the complex network field, I understand the meaning of keywords.
My life, which is 15. If this happened when I was seven years old, what would my life be like if I had my 27-year-old knowledge reserve when I was 15 years old?
I can't imagine.
Note: This is a very weighty point of view, which reflects the difficulties in the process of seeking knowledge and exploration, and also expresses the short helplessness of life. This is Miss Gao's best performance.
4. Chao Wen said that I will die in the evening.
This is a great era, and this is an era that will come.
Give the years civilization, not the years civilization.
This time, I am the spokesman of the infinite universe.
This time, I am a broken-wall person who enjoys knowledge.
Note: As a fan of Li's birthday, I think it's really inappropriate for him to interrupt in the middle of the debate. Will you stop being a demon?
However, in the stage of surprise attack, Li Dan gave Edison a good feedback. The monopoly of knowledge creates value, and the monopoly of knowledge allows some people to create value and gain income.
1, everyone knows what I know and everyone knows what I shouldn't know, one by one.
I must know how to maintain my prostate. My husband is ill and can go to the hospital.
Nine-year compulsory education is gone, should we engage in nine-year forced exile?
Note: Foer's point can enjoy knowledge, which will lead to a waste of resources. Without screening, there will be a lot of invalid information, but in the end she will focus on "what do you know so much?" It means "counterintelligence", which also allows Chen Ming to seize this loophole.
This technology has seriously affected the diversity of human beings, and we only have one common feature, which is erudition.
I have such a big ass, and you told me to wear Yang Qihan's pants, but I couldn't.
3, technology does not distinguish between good and evil, but people.
A pervert is proficient in psychology, a professional killer becomes an animal expert, and all postdocs commit crimes. What will the world be like?
Maintaining the beauty of a world requires the joint efforts of all of us, while destroying the world requires only a few people.
4. The world needs hazy beauty. Ignorance is relative, but it may also be the source of happiness.
I used to look at the mountains and the sea, but now I see countless molecules and formulas, and the world is veiled. Isn't it wonderful?
Note: I don't agree with Fu Seoul. Having more knowledge does not mean losing the ability to perceive beauty. On the field, Gao and Gao are all intellectual elites. They treat the world with ease and can perceive the beauty of the world better than we can, okay?
5. erudition is good, but is erupting erudition overnight really a good thing?
It will make us unable to agree with each other. In the end, we will all become the screws on the human optical machine and experience another more painful mediocrity in the well-known illusion.
1 First, turn the right to speak to yourself, put forward that information, knowledge and wisdom are three things, and use a simple example to set things right.
He defined "the temperature of a bottle of water is 7 degrees" as "information".
Define "water will freeze at zero" as "knowledge".
Define "selling water into popsicles to others" as "wisdom and ability".
Note: This place shows how complicated Chen Ming is. Previous debaters were always vague about "whether knowledge is ability" during the debate. Professor Xue questioned him many times and didn't get a positive response. It's just that when Yang Qixin and Zhao Yingnan quarreled, they mentioned that "* * * enjoys knowledge, but it doesn't mean * * enjoys ability". But what is the subtle difference between ability and knowledge?
Strange Tales from a Lonely Studio is a stage to show one's personality. Think about how it is different from treating people as robots if the chip can reshape your knowledge and ability system. That's why I thought it might be difficult to play diamonds at first.
Chen Ming's example, which separates the ability from the discussion scope of the topic, shows that even if we have the same knowledge, the processing and application of knowledge depends on the individual's ability, which is reasonable and convincing.
2, knowledge, will not affect our choice, even if two people with the same level of knowledge, the value choice is not necessarily the same, so * * * to enjoy knowledge obliterates the diversity of the world and does not exist.
Chen Ming cited the example of the world's top lung disease experts. When a pulmonary specialist reaches a certain height, he has almost mastered the corresponding professional knowledge, but in the choice of smoking, it is not the same. Some people put health first, while others put freedom first, which shows that the value ranking of each of us in our hearts will not be affected by * * *.
Note: A powerful player like Chen Ming in the Story of Chipa will definitely dismantle the arguments thrown by the other debater at the first time, instead of prevaricating with "I don't understand what you are talking about". At the same time, the debate is full of sparks, which is also the fun of watching the debate as an audience.
3. In the face of Fu Seoul's viewpoint of "knowingly committing a crime", he adopted "reduction to absurdity" or even "gradual reduction to absurdity" to make everyone realize the absurdity of this argument.
Human nature is unpredictable, and the consequences of a nuclear bomb are unimaginable. Then we can't carry out the nuclear doctoral education in universities today. Do you know which students are bad students in this kind of teaching?
Then master's education is not easy to teach, and primary education is not easy to teach. What should I do? When I enter primary school, I have to take a basic moral test first. If there is danger, sorry, this student can't teach!
According to this logic, all the processes of knowledge dissemination and popularization may be used by the bad guys. Then we should invent a chip, erase everyone's knowledge in one second, and the world will be safe. We will all become monkeys.
Note: The debate is strong and the logic is close, so it is the uncrowned king of this issue.
4, knowledge * * * enjoyment is not to open the window, but let us open the door of each world, go to one parallel colorful world, see the same earth, see countless parallel worlds.
1, the ability of a knowledge field comes from the process of learning this knowledge.
Knowledge is just a tool, no matter how good it is, we talents are the purpose. Our attitude towards knowledge today is wrong, so we can't enjoy the value of having knowledge.
The process of acquiring knowledge cannot be omitted.
Then use The Journey to the West's story about why the Buddha wanted the Tang Priest to go through all kinds of difficulties, instead of directly learning from him:
Scriptures can be transported and enjoyed, but the way to learn from them cannot be done. It is not the scriptures that make Tang Priest Tang Priest, but the way to learn from them.
We are not living in an era when knowledge is locked in a temple, but in an era of information explosion. We live in an era when the speed of knowledge generation exceeds the speed of knowledge storage.
The test of our time is precisely your ability to select, distinguish and classify from this knowledge. This ability is my intuition. Practice makes perfect, and it can't be stored in the chip.
And your chip makes you feel that you know everything, giving you unnecessary knowledge and taking away your necessary knowledge.
Note: "What should our attitude towards knowledge be today?" Zhan Qingyun put forward this question, which is a very good point of view. When knowledge is "gained for nothing", how should we treat it?
This is a realistic problem that we have to face in this era, and knowledge payment is gradually emerging. When the screen is full of advertisements such as "30-day crash 10W+ writer".
Should we rethink the meaning of writing? When the so-called writing skills and routines have been formed in your mind, will you have forgotten the original intention of writing?
2. Knowledge is different from chip, it is what we think is right.
* * * The bargaining chip for enjoying knowledge is to let others decide for you what knowledge is and what truth is.
The relationship between man and knowledge is interaction, not obedience.
Those times of knowledge progress are times when people can deny knowledge.
Note: Just after Chen Ming explained the difference between information, knowledge and ability, Zhan Qingyun struggled with the definition of knowledge itself. This statement is not good, even Gao questioned it in the raid and believed it. This is not knowledge, but truth.
Open lever connecting rod
Chen Ming: "Knowledge is a summary of external laws that can be falsified."
Zhan Qingyun: "The reason why knowledge can be falsified is because different people in each era believe in different things. Unifying everyone's thoughts with a set of standards today will never be falsified. "
Chen Ming: "There is no unification. When the other party talked about thermodynamics just now, Kelvin said that the building has been built, and you covered up half the sentence. There are only two dark clouds floating on it. Are those two just quantum mechanics and relativity? If Newton had known Kelvin at the age of seven, how much would our physics society have improved? "
Zhan Qingyun: "Why are there those two dark clouds? Isn't it time? Does anyone still believe that this building is not finished yet? "
Chen Ming: "No, because you covered up these two sentences and misled everyone's judgment, so knowledge monopoly can bring knowledge control."
1. Why does religion persecute knowledge and science? Because science is competing with religion for the right to explain the world.
The glory and dissipation of knowledge in Baghdad proves that it is extremely difficult to build knowledge, but it is easy to destroy it.
We are all vested interests in knowledge. How can you have the heart to deprive those who have no resources to enjoy knowledge?
For the convenience of parents, do you want a child to sit in a chair for eight hours a day just to learn knowledge that he can't remember when he grows up?
4. Let the poor live more expensive children "and" Let the poor afford medical care and anticancer drugs "are the most powerful sensational weapons in themselves. Justice is above everything else, just like a box office victory that narrowly escaped.
1, intellectual copyright can protect the interests of inventors, and interests can drive the production of science and technology more than love.
By allowing only the companies that are most likely to salvage jewelry, it is specifically explained that "being exclusive" is a way to save unnecessary costs, that is, monopolizing something.
Because I love doing one thing, I won't calculate the cost. But in order to gain, we will control the cost and pursue the maximum rate of return.
Note: At the end of "The Story of Chipa", Gao stood up and said that this was the most powerful argument of the opposing side, and the audience did.
Controlling cost is to reduce the waste of resources for society and to reduce unnecessary consumption for individuals. Life is short, and personal ability is limited after all. In this short life, a person always has "what can be done and what can't be done". In the process of seeking knowledge, one can often see the limitations of one's own ability and the best love for life.
In junior high school, I sit at the same table with my good friends. I find myself sleepy in physics class, but energetic in history class. I spent the same time on different subjects, but the results were far from each other. It is in this differentiation that I gradually see the development direction of my life.
Now, if you have a chip and introduce all the general knowledge into your mind, you know everything. How can you achieve "specialization" in the confusing information?
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
This technology is related to the survival of the wonderful planet because it is related to whether we have one brain or countless brains. We should not be complacent because of mediocrity.
What children in mountainous areas lack is not knowledge, but the opportunity to change their destiny with knowledge, and they lack a person who tells them how to use knowledge.
What is more terrible than lack of knowledge is that these people who study hard find knowledge useless.
We can enjoy education and opinions, but we can't directly enjoy the result. This is not sharing knowledge, it is killing knowledge.
Children in mountainous areas need someone to tell them how to use knowledge, so let everyone know all the knowledge with this chip first. In the following education, we are committed to studying creativity, breakthrough and openness, updating it, challenging it and questioning it.
Broaden the boundaries of knowledge chips and keep moving towards the unknown. This is an educational model that can come to us in the future, which saves children the time of memorizing and gives them more creative sky.
This is all we can do after we get the chip. It is not that we have nothing to do. We still have stars and the sea!
Note: In my eyes, this last sentence is really the best in the audience. I am glad to hear such a vision of education on such a variety stage. After saying Fu's sentence in Seoul, "Nine-year compulsory education is gone, only nine years of forced exile", I feel deeply sad. Is the boundary of our education so narrow?
Later, Kang Geyong said, "You want your child to sit in a chair for eight hours a day just to learn what he can't remember when he grows up?" He directly questioned this educational model.
What is a good education? What Chen Ming said in the conclusion can be used as a reference.
As a veteran figure in the story of Seven Overlords, Chen Ming is often labeled as "the king of chicken soup" and "the crazy wife protector". It is often said that he stands in the center of the universe and calls for love.
Throw away his label. As a teacher, he always has his own insistence on education, which is what moved me when I heard him say this.
In the fourth season of Qipa Shuo, Do you want to customize your child's perfect life with one click, Chen Ming expressed his understanding of education.
"The basic concept of traditional education is basically a sculpture model. The object of education is children. The object of modern education may have changed from children to the environment.
We are no longer concerned with this flower, but with air, water, soil and nutrients. We should try our best to create an environment for children to grow up and make the possibility "normal". This is the most beautiful place of education, and the deadly enemy of education is customization, and the original intention is wrong. "
If one day the nine-year compulsory education really disappears, it doesn't mean that we have nothing to do. On the contrary, we really have a lot to do.
If a chip can share all the knowledge and information of 7 billion people at the same time, it means almost knowing everything.
And what is the state of a person who has implanted a chip and knows almost everything? One of Borges' famous short stories is called Faanes, which describes a man who knows almost everything without remembering anything.
That person remembers all the details that happened every moment, but because he remembers everything, he has not forgotten anything. A person who has not forgotten anything is actually equal to no knowledge.
Because the acquisition of knowledge is to delete something that is not important to you, and you can gain something through self-selection. It is precisely because economists and sociologists can see different emphases from the same thing that various disciplines have emerged.
If all the information today is concentrated in a person's mind, for him, not knowing what is important is tantamount to not gaining knowledge.
Note: I have been a fan of Daochang for almost ten years. I am really excited to see Daochang appear on the stage as the current male god. For the stage of "The Story of Seven Pavilions", the Taoist may seem a little out of place, and even doubt the debate in the middle. He is "sitting on the sidelines" and it is difficult to choose his own holder.
But this is also a valuable place for Taoist priests. He is always wary of any "one-sided" view.
Many times, when we have a one-sided view of the world and don't know enough about the cause and effect of the incident, we will make an early judgment. Few people are really willing to question the incident itself and insist on understanding the whole picture before making a judgment.
At the end of this issue, Ma Dong mentioned a game that teachers in Europe and America often lead students to play together: throwing a speech and then letting students judge whether it is a fact or an opinion.
"Humans are making progress."
"point of view."
"Technology neutrality."
"point of view."
"All men are created equal."
"point of view."