The man with a machete suddenly jumped on an electric car, intercepted the police car of an electric car, and smashed the glass window of the police car with a machete very fiercely, causing a policeman's hand injury. Later, in the face of the arrest of law enforcement police, he not only refused to surrender, but even intensified, arrogantly approaching the police with a machete.
The police were very restrained at that time. I saw that under his violent resistance to arrest, the police had been forced to keep retreating. But instead, he pushed his luck, shouting for the police to beat him, and picking up the tableware and plates of the roadside restaurant to beat the police.
After repeated persuasion, warning and shooting into the air, the police shot him to subdue him. The man fell to the ground the moment he was shot. The police stepped forward and kicked the knife he had dropped to the ground, and then called the hospital for rescue.
So we can see that the purpose of the police shooting is not to kill him. Moreover, the police shot his leg, not his upper body. The purpose of the police shooting was to subdue him. Moreover, the police immediately called an ambulance to treat him.
The police came with guns at that time. Are there enough procedures? I think there is. According to the law, the police have the right to shoot and stop those who resist or obstruct the people's police from performing their duties according to law by violent means or violently attack the people's police and endanger personal safety.
The man smashed the police car window with a machete and injured the police. Then he kept swinging his knife to approach the police and attacked the police with tableware. These acts have constituted violent resistance to law enforcement and endangered the personal safety of the police. After the police fired a warning shot again, they shot him to subdue him. This kind of behavior belongs to the duty of the police to protect themselves and the people's safety, and it is a correct and legal choice.
The man approached the police at close range with a knife, which was very dangerous for the police. Cops are also flesh and blood. If you are cut with a knife at close range by a person, the consequences are unimaginable. I think the police are a very dangerous and great duty. They are faced with ferocious criminals. In order to deal with the bad guys, the police killed people to protect their own safety, and shot the men to subdue them according to law.
After the police shot, the man was finally rescued. Will the police be affected? I will! For the police who shot, they should write a very detailed report on the shooting behavior after returning, and the relevant departments will also investigate and verify whether it is reasonable and compliant. At the same time, I will also receive psychological counseling. After all, the police feel uncomfortable and there will be great pressure and burden.
Conclusion: Don't ignore the law, and don't think that the police fired warning shots just to scare people. In today's society ruled by law, the police can shoot to stop crimes under the circumstances of shooting.