It does look like it. When using this trademark, it may infringe the copyright of others. As for whether it is infringement, it is also a matter of opinion. No one will assert that this is not exactly the same design until the end.

I provide the landlord with a similar copyright infringement dispute case for your reference:

On the left is the plaintiff's design and on the right is the defendant's design. At present, the status of the case is: the plaintiff won the case in the first instance! After two court sessions, the verdict of the first instance is as follows: the defendant was found to have copied the copyright work V "Clever Snake" of ttf, and was responsible for immediately stopping the production and sale of this product "Clever Snake", which infringed the copyright of the plaintiff "Victory" high-grade jewelry V, and compensated ttf for its economic loss 1.5 million yuan within ten days. The defendant has appealed at present.

The above cases are mainly similar in head, but the infringement was found in the first instance. Look at the landlord and think about it.