In Ye Shouzheng's readme, he pointed out that Hong Mao was killed by Ye Shouzheng after killing Nobita. But in my opinion, this is unreasonable. After all, Hongmao was so scared after the tragic deaths of Ouyang and Xu Bran that he gave up his plan several times. Moreover, under the threat of Ye Shouzheng, he just betrayed his eldest brother Wang Xinyuan. How could he suddenly go back and take great risks to kill people when he had the opportunity to escape? If Ye Shou is lying, he killed Hongmao, and then killed the informer Shinfu to shut him up, which contradicts the description of "he is very kind to informers". And in the face of robbers, he also righteously questioned "Why do you want to hurt innocent people?" How can his hands be covered with blood?
Wang Xinyuan was redeemed in death, while the victim degenerated in revenge, put on the cloak of "justice" and carried out malicious lynching in the dark. This discussion of "crime and punishment" has philosophical significance in Agatha's works. When the "victim" is immersed in the role of "perpetrator", the horror drama of "Lucifer effect" is also being staged, and the boundary between good and evil is fragile enough to make people's backs chill.