Current location - Plastic Surgery and Aesthetics Network - Jewelry brand - What value and loss does the discovery of Cao Cao's tomb have for us? What other history can be verified? Thank you for your questions.
What value and loss does the discovery of Cao Cao's tomb have for us? What other history can be verified? Thank you for your questions.
As a historical and cultural name, Anyang, Henan Province has a world-famous cultural heritage-Yin Ruins. Its existence not only confirmed the existence of China Shang Dynasty, but also reconstructed the framework of early ancient history of China. Commentator of Yin Ruins: "Because we analyzed the excavations in Oracle Bone Inscriptions, we also found physical archaeological evidence and compared it with historical books. They conform to the double evidence law and can prove that Yin Ruins are true. " Anyang is not only the seat of Yin Ruins, the capital of Shang Dynasty, but also the cemetery of Yuan Shikai, the supreme ruler of the Republic of China. The addition of Cao Cao's tomb will undoubtedly help Anyang realize the tourism fist product of three generations of emperors' dreams. The reporter noted that although Anyang achieved a tourism income of 4.26 billion yuan in 2008, the government's goal is to reach 5 billion yuan in 20 10 and double it in 20 15, reaching 10 billion yuan. Therefore, for Anyang, the existence of Cao Cao's tomb is of great significance. Out of Anyang, look at Handan, Hebei Province, which is separated by a river. As 1994, Handan is listed as a national historical and cultural city by the State Council, with more than 500 cultural relics and historic sites 1500. What needs special attention is that there are Cao Wei Jian 'an cultural sites in Handan. Therefore, Handan has been looking forward to discovering Cao Cao's tomb in its jurisdiction, creating Cao Wei's cultural tourism products, and taking this as a leader to drive the development of other historical and cultural tourism products in the city. The reporter noted that in 2008, Handan achieved a tourism income of 4 billion yuan, but their plan is to double the tourism income to 8 billion yuan by 20 10. Therefore, seeing the insufficient evidence of Cao Cao's tomb in Anyang, Handan has also become the area with the highest voice of questioning Cao Cao's tomb. Not only Anyang, Henan Province and Handan, Hebei Province hope to build a tourism industry through Cao Cao's tomb, but Bozhou, Anhui Province is also full of expectations for Cao Cao's tomb. One of the city image positioning of Bozhou is the hometown of Cao Wei, and Bozhou also has the tomb of Cao Tengzong, the grandfather of Cao Cao. Therefore, some Bozhou people think that Cao Cao may also be buried in Bozhou. The reporter noted that in 2008, Bozhou achieved a tourism income of 654.38 billion yuan, and their goal is to strive for a total tourism income of 4.5 billion yuan within three years. In the interview, Bozhou was also skeptical about the confirmation of Cao Cao's tomb in Anyang. Faced with all kinds of doubts, the Henan Provincial Cultural Relics Bureau held a special briefing on archaeological discoveries on the last day of last year. Sun Xinmin, director of the Henan Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, said that there are eight similar stone tablets engraved with the words "King Wu of Wei" in the tomb. Except for one that was recovered from a grave robber, the other seven were unearthed through scientific excavation, and it is absolutely impossible for modern people to forge them. However, someone immediately refuted his point of view. According to Liu Xinchang, president of Handan Historical Society, this way of reasoning and argumentation is not rigorous enough, and according to his research, some places in Anyang Cao Cao's tomb are also inconsistent with historical records. Then, can Henan keep this tomb of Cao Cao and add a heavyweight engine to the local tourism economy? Liu Xinchang, president of Handan Historical Society: "I think we should be cautious about this conclusion." Doubt 1: Why are there gold, silver and jewels in the tomb? Liu Xinchang believes that one of the doubts that this Eastern Han Dynasty tomb cannot be confirmed as Cao Cao's tomb is that after repeated excavation by grave robbers, there are still gold, silver, jade, agate ornaments and crystal beads unearthed in the tomb, which is seriously inconsistent with Cao Cao's teachings that "gold, silver, jade, copper and iron are not allowed to be sent". Liu Xinchang: "These are all Cao Cao. What is forbidden to be buried in the heritage. The result appeared, how can this be explained? " In addition, what Liu Xinchang can't understand is that not only jade and agate have been unearthed in the tomb, but even eight stone tablets also show that there are fallen tigers, halberds and broadswords. Among the funerary objects, there are also some that are inconsistent with Cao Cao's decrees. "This is made of steel, such as Cao Cao's copper and iron, and it is not allowed to be buried. As a result, these things came out of the tomb. How to explain it? " Liu Xinchang told reporters that Cao Zhi, the son of Cao Cao, wrote an article "The Funeral of Emperor Wu", describing the scene of Cao Cao's burial. Two of them specifically mentioned that "seals don't exist, only lotus flowers", which means that in order to strictly abide by Cao Cao's legacy, none of the seals used by Cao Cao were buried with him. If Cao Zhi's article is true, then this Eastern Han tomb with gold, silver and jewels unearthed is probably not Cao Cao's tomb. On this topic, Pan Weibin, the archaeological captain, said in response to media questions that these jewels and jade are used to decorate clothes, not precious things, nor do they violate Cao Cao's own law that "gold, pearls, jade, copper and iron are not allowed to be sent". Doubt 2: Is the female skeleton inconsistent with the record? Liu Xinchang's second question is that the reflection clearly records that Cao Cao's queen Bian Shi was buried with her. Other historical classics also show that Bian Shi was about 70 years old when he died, but the two female bones in the tomb were about 40 and 20 years old respectively. Obviously inconsistent with historical records. However, experts invited by Henan Provincial Cultural Relics Bureau could not draw conclusions on these issues. In the briefing, they explained why there was no truth in the epitaph and Wei's title. Sun Yingmin, deputy director of Henan Provincial Cultural Relics Bureau and spokesperson: "There is no epitaph in Cao Cao's tomb, which we think is normal." Although the Henan Provincial Bureau of Cultural Relics is sure that this Eastern Han Tomb is Cao Cao's Tomb, Liu Xinchang thinks that it is more appropriate to rename this Eastern Han Tomb as Cao Wei's Tomb temporarily in the absence of core evidence and many doubts, and it is not too late to correct it when more accurate evidence is found to prove that it is Cao Cao's Tomb. Liu Xinchang: "We must draw a conclusion cautiously." In addition, Liu Xinchang also told reporters that unlike the unearthed tombs, this ancient tomb of the Eastern Han Dynasty was visited by grave robbers many times. Are the cultural relics unearthed in it put in by future generations for some purpose? This possibility needs to be ruled out. Pan Weibin, the captain of the archaeological team of Cao Cao's tomb and an associate researcher of Henan Institute of Archaeology, said: "Tomb No.2 has direct evidence of the king of Wei and Wu, and it exists. There are other places to replace its cultural relics, so its scale is here, and there are no other tombs. It was found to be bigger than this tomb, so this tomb should be affirmative. " So, is there really no bigger tomb around this tomb? The words of the archaeological captain are not reassuring. "The key is that we don't know a lot of things. What is unknown underground? I don't know. It is impossible for us to mobilize tens of thousands of people to go into battle and travel all over the province and the country. It is out of the question. Many underground cultural relics are unknown to us and unknown. " In order to know if there are any bigger graves nearby, the reporter began to ask the villagers in Xigaoxue Village. After a long inquiry, the villager named Wang Hongjun told reporters that he suspected that there was a big tomb in the wheat field about 400 meters away from Cao Cao's tomb. Because he watered the wheat field, every time the water came to this framed place, he didn't go forward, but kept watering the ground for 20 hours. Villager: "It was a small hole at first. Later, it got bigger. When it gets bigger, it is filled. Fill it out and water it. The whole hole is getting bigger and bigger It may be an ancient tomb or something else, such as a tunnel or a hole. At first there were tiles in the hole, and then the hole became bigger. " Reporter: "Did you report to Murakami?" Villager: "Who will report it?" Unexpectedly, the farmer also told reporters that this phenomenon also exists in places more than ten meters away from this land. "This is the main pit, bigger than that pit. There is also a pit in this place. " "Bigger than that pit?" "Yes, the mouth is here. Fill the pit. " "If you hadn't said it, you wouldn't have seen it." Are the two pits so close to Cao Cao's tomb ancient tombs? Which dynasty did the mausoleum belong to? Was it stolen? Is there a bigger tomb near Cao Cao's tomb? All this is still unknown at present. Is Cao Cao's tomb in Henan at present? Is this tomb of the Eastern Han Dynasty the tomb of Cao Cao? There was a heated debate between the pros and cons. While the two sides were arguing, the reporter jumped out of this incident and went to Yin Ruins, also in Anyang. Here, a large number of unearthed cultural relics and Oracle bones are presented to the audience. The commentator also told the reporter that unlike Cao Cao's tomb, he has worked here for four years and has not heard anyone suspect that the Yin Ruins are fake. Because of this, Yin Ruins attract a large number of tourists. Reporter: "Are there any experts questioning now?" "I don't seem to have heard this voice. What I saw in the information was also at the beginning of the last century, nor was it this century. " Reporter: "Then why do you think so many people question Cao Cao's tomb?" "It is still necessary to compare the unearthed cultural relics with historical records and evaluate whether the logical relationship during the period is strong, so as to judge whether this tomb really exists." The controversy surrounding Cao Cao's tomb is really dazzling. We are not historians or archaeologists, and we have no right to speak on this topic, but in any case, we all hope that the final conclusion should stand any test, which is a respect for history and a responsibility to future generations. The same tomb of Cao Cao may have different images in different people's eyes. For history lovers, it satisfies the curiosity that has not been solved for many years. For experts, it contains rich historical and cultural information. For the government, it can drive a cultural tourism boom. Because of this, we can't simply look at the discovery of Cao Cao's tomb, otherwise it will be difficult to avoid becoming another war of words to grab celebrities. When the news of the confirmation of Cao Cao's tomb was announced, Anyang police also quickly sent special police to pull up the cordon at the scene, armed with live ammunition and on duty 24 hours a day. "Ensure the safety of Cao Cao's tomb." At the same time, the local public security organs once again urged those criminal suspects who robbed Cao Cao's tomb to turn over the cultural relics as soon as possible, and awarded the whistleblower with a maximum reward of 65,438+10,000 yuan. "Urge the suspect again." A series of actions by Anyang police not only protect cultural relics and crack down on crimes, but also show Anyang's determination to preserve Cao Cao's tomb. In the investigation, the reporter found that there are many examples of different cities competing for celebrities and triggering a war of words. In 2008, in order to compete for the banner of Zhuge Liang's farming, Xiangfan City, Hubei Province took the lead in launching the TV advertisement of "Zhuge Liang's farming, landscape Xiangfan City". Xiangfan's behavior also angered Nanyang, because Zhuge Liang's "Teacher's Watch" clearly stated that "I am wearing cloth and plowing in Nanyang". Why did Zhuge Liang go to Xiangfan to farm after 1700 years? So the two cities searched for historical evidence favorable to them and launched a war of words. According to experts' analysis, Nanyang's efforts to defend Zhuge Liang are because in 2008, Nanyang's comprehensive tourism income was 5.6 billion yuan, and by 20 12, this figure will reach1500 million yuan. If Xiangfan takes away Zhuge Liang's cultivated land, it may affect the realization of this goal. In addition, the two cities are so close that if they don't fight back, they don't know what the other side will take. For the attackers, Xiangfan's tourism revenue in 2008 was 4.7 billion yuan. In order to increase tourism income quickly, some concepts are needed to support it. The same example happened again in August this year. Sichuan Jiangyou and Hubei Anlu also scuffled with the State Administration for Industry and Commerce for grabbing celebrities. The cause of the incident is that in August this year, in Anlu City, Hubei Province, a "hometown of Li Bai, hometown of ginkgo biloba, Anlu, Hubei welcomes you!" Jiangyou city, Sichuan Province, was dissatisfied with this advertisement. Sichuan Jiangyou said that Li Bai was born in Jiangyou and applied for the trademark "Li Bai's hometown", but Anlu was not allowed to use it. Anlu also said that Li Bai has lived in Anlu for 10 years, and of course he can use the advertising words of Li Bai's hometown. Finally, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce ruled that Pinglu could use the advertising words of "Li Bai's hometown". At present, grabbing celebrities seems to have become a phenomenon, and all the cities involved in grabbing celebrities have gained a certain degree of social attention. At the same time, it also reflects that in order to develop tourism economy, all localities have begun to compete for resources. Half-hour observation: Looking at the new value of Cao Cao's tomb with a new eye When the debate about Cao Cao's tomb is heating up day by day, we can't ignore the fact that we have no absolute advantage in the development of historical and cultural products. Cao Cao is undoubtedly a historical figure in China, but many game fans know that the most famous game developers in the Three Kingdoms are not in China but in Japan, and their cultural products packaged with the history of China can also be popular all over the world. Movies, TV plays and books created by Japanese and Korean historical figures often set off a wave of sales boom in China market. In this sense, in the face of Cao Cao's tomb, we should not focus on its authenticity, but should think more about how to transform our rich historical and cultural heritage into cultural products with China symbols. In the process of coping with the financial crisis, the vitality of the cultural industry has been stimulated as never before, and its share in China's economy has risen against the trend. I hope this background change can encourage everyone to look at the value of Cao Cao's tomb with a new eye.