Speaking of rendering quality. . In the horizontal comparison of similar software built-in renderers. . . The overall effect is slightly inferior to MAYA's MR renderer. . Ranked second. . The premise is that MR renderer has a GI plug-in. . . But the rendering speed is about 3-5 times that of MR renderer. . .
The comprehensive level is comparable to that of VRAY renderer. . The ability of rendering high reflection and low diffuse reflection materials such as metal, plastic and glass is stronger than VRAY, even stronger than MR. . Rendering cotton, leather, wood and other materials with low reflection and high diffuse reflection is weaker than VRAY. . . Therefore, C4D is suitable for rendering industrial products such as automobiles, jewelry and household appliances. . . VRAY is suitable for rendering paper products, wood products, textiles and so on. . . The overall effect is basically the same as VRAY. . The advantages of the two renderers can complement each other well. . . Install a VRAY in C4D with two renderers. . Just like a tiger. . The speed is slightly faster than VRAY. . Because VRAY is fast, too. . . So the speed advantage is not obvious. Therefore, it is judged that the two are equal.
If TEAMREDER official network module is installed. . . Speed absolutely kills any network renderer in the world at present. . .
On the whole. . . Definitely the most practical built-in renderer. . . Compared with the useless line drawing renderer of 3DMAX. . It's definitely a world of difference. . .
The comprehensive evaluation is. . . On the premise of not relying on third-party plug-ins. . . The most comprehensive renderer in the world