First, in terms of performance and technology, Meizu m9, ZTE u880 and above, Huawei u8800 and above, Tianyu w700, Xiaomi m 1 and other models have been able to kill all the models that Nokia thinks except n9 00, while Meizu mx and Xiaomi m 1 are even stronger than n9-00, which can completely kill all the current Nokia models. Some domestic models have been ranked in the global mobile phone flagship and high-end, while ZTE has become the fifth mobile phone share in the world at 20 10, second only to Nokia, Samsung, Apple, htc, moto, lg, Sony Ericsson and Huawei. Meizu m9 has the same performance as Apple's iphone4, with desire hd from htc, inredible s from Samsung i9000, Huawei u8800 and milestone2 from moto, desire z from htc, Tianyu w700 and lg p900 optimus 2x, m 1 slightly higher than htc's sensation. Meizu mx and Samsung i9 100, iphone5 and milestone3 are at the same level and higher than moto's flagship me860arix and photon, and htc's g 14.
On the other hand, non-smart phones, such as oppo, Dowell and Kyozaki, adopt the mtk platform with the lowest performance in the world, and have no basic functions such as 3g and wifi. Their performance is even worse than that of Nokia's s40 platform, and the java compatibility rate is only 5%. Oppo, in particular, has the same performance as the cottage, but sells the high-end prices of international brands.
To sum up, the development of domestic smart phones, such as Huawei, ZTE, Meizu, Tianyu, Xiaomi and Lenovo, has far surpassed Nokia in technology, while moto, Apple, Samsung and htc are at the global leading level, and some of them are already at the top of the global flagship phones.
However, under the leadership of oppo, which is the shame of China, and cppo, Dove and Kyozaki, which imitate oppo, all kinds of mtk shanzhai phones are rampant, and their performance is at the lowest level in the world. Even in Africa, they don't need to make calls or send text messages, and even have problems with java installation, which is basically the level of Nokia and Sony Ericsson five or six years ago. 、
Second, in terms of performance, we can talk about cost performance. Meizu M92011went public. At that time, the resolution of 960x640 was the highest in the world, and the hardware configuration was the same as that of iphone4. The price of Bank of China 2499 and iphone4 is less than half. Xiaomi m 1, Bank of China price 1999, Qualcomm 8260 processor 1g ram, but the performance is higher than that of parallel imports 3200 and HTC G14Sensing Z710 with licensed goods 4999, and the price difference is nearly half. Huawei u8800 has the same performance as milestone2, and the Bank of China 1499. Its performance is second only to Nokia n8 and e7, and its price is only 60% to 70% of that of parallel imports. ZTE u880, 800-frequency 5 12m capacitive screen, the performance once again kills all Nokia models except n9, Samsung s5830 and htc g8, but the price is Bank of China 1059. There are 999 ZTE V880,6v880, 256m ram, capacitive screen, seconds kill Nokia X6,5230, c6 00, c5 03, the price is 999. All the above are licensed prices, which are guaranteed throughout the country, much safer than any parallel imports, and not cost-effective! ! ! ! ! !
At the other end, take the u529 of oppo as an example. The compatibility rate of mtk platform with java is only 5%. It has no touch screen, 2.5mm headphone jack, no wifi and no 3g support. It can be said that what function and performance does the department have, just like the carpet hut on the street. Can be killed by any non-intelligent machine in s40 of Nokia 500. Compared with ZTE v880 and Nokia 5230, the performance gap is over 100 times, and the price is actually 2499 nationwide. This price-performance ratio is simply the lower limit of the play, and it is infinitely negative.
To sum up, the cost performance of domestic mobile phones is concentrated on smart phones, such as Huawei, ZTE and Xiaomi. Meizu is above average, non-smart phones have no cost performance, and oppo, Vito and Kyozaki have negative cost performance.
Third, we can talk about quality from performance and cost performance. As transnational internationalization, ZTE and Huawei compete with moto, Nokia, Samsung and Apple, and the quality is beyond doubt. The millet manufactured by moto is not much worse. Meizu Zhuhai, average quality. However, performance garbage is useless, and the quality is better. Is it true that the quality of feces is worth eating after wearing 3-year-old underwear? Oppo is from Dongguan and Kyozaki is from Shenzhen. How dare its quality compare with the international market and moto OEM?
To sum up, the quality of domestic machines with high performance-to-price ratio is not bad, and talking about quality with low performance-to-price ratio is tantamount to seeking fish from the edge of the tree.