Due to serious irresponsibility, judicial authentication institutions have caused great losses to the legitimate rights and interests of the parties. Where a judicial authentication institution fraudulently obtains registration by other fraudulent means, abuses its power or neglects its duty in management, thus causing serious consequences, it shall be investigated for corresponding legal responsibilities.

Measures for the Administration of Registration of Judicial Authentication Institutions (Decree No.95 of the Ministry of Justice of the People's Republic of China)

Thirty-ninth judicial authentication institutions in any of the following circumstances, given a warning by the provincial judicial administrative organs according to law, and ordered to make corrections:

(1) Engaging in judicial authentication activities beyond the registered business scope of judicial authentication;

(two) the establishment of branches without legal registration;

(3) Failing to handle the change registration according to law;

(4) Lending a judicial authentication license;

(5) Organizing persons who have not obtained the practice certificate of judicial appraisers to engage in judicial expertise;

(6) refusing to accept the entrustment of judicial expertise without justifiable reasons;

(seven) in violation of the measures for the administration of judicial expertise fees;

(eight) pay kickbacks, referral fees, false propaganda and other improper acts;

(nine) refusing to accept the supervision and inspection of the judicial administrative organ or providing false materials to it;

(ten) other circumstances stipulated by laws, regulations and rules.

Fortieth judicial authentication institutions in any of the following circumstances, by the provincial judicial administrative organs to stop engaging in judicial authentication business for more than three months but less than one year; If the circumstances are serious, the registration shall be cancelled:

(a) serious irresponsibility, causing heavy losses to the legitimate rights and interests of the parties;

(two) one of the circumstances stipulated in article thirty-ninth of these measures, and caused serious consequences;

(3) Providing false documents or defrauding registration by other fraudulent means;

(4) Other circumstances stipulated by laws and regulations.

Article 41 The civil liability that judicial authentication institutions should bear for illegal and wrong acts in judicial authentication activities shall be implemented in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Law.

Forty-second staff members of judicial administrative organs who abuse their powers and neglect their duties in management, resulting in serious consequences, shall be investigated for corresponding legal responsibilities according to law.

Decision of NPC Standing Committee on Judicial Appraisal Management

(Adopted at the 14th meeting of the Standing Committee of the Tenth NPC on February 28th, 2005)

Twelve, appraisers and authentication institutions engaged in judicial authentication business, should abide by laws and regulations, abide by professional ethics and professional discipline, respect science, abide by technical operation norms.

Thirteen, the appraiser or appraisal institution in violation of the provisions of this decision, shall be given a warning by the judicial administrative department of the provincial people's government and ordered to make corrections.

In any of the following circumstances, the judicial administrative department of the provincial people's government shall give a punishment of stopping engaging in judicial authentication business for more than three months and less than one year; If the circumstances are serious, the registration shall be cancelled:

(a) serious irresponsibility, causing heavy losses to the legitimate rights and interests of the parties;

(2) Providing false documents or defrauding registration by other fraudulent means;

(3) Refusing to testify in court after being notified by the people's court according to law;

(4) Other circumstances stipulated by laws and administrative regulations.

If the appraiser intentionally makes a false appraisal, which constitutes a crime, he shall be investigated for criminal responsibility according to law; If it does not constitute a crime, it shall be punished in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

Fourteen, the judicial administrative department in the registration and management of appraisers and authentication institutions, should act in strict accordance with the law, and actively promote the standardization and legalization of judicial expertise. Those who are directly responsible for abusing their powers and neglecting their duties, resulting in serious consequences, should be investigated for corresponding legal responsibilities.