I am not a racist, but I don't want this question to be answered from the moral high point of "anti-racism". I object to blaming the problem on "white power aesthetics". I don't study anthropology, psychology or plastic surgery, but as a designer, "beauty" is something we have been thinking about. My knowledge is limited, and this right of reply is a brick. Welcome to correct me. I don't deny that the black picture posted by Uncle yol is also beautiful, but it is more of an aesthetic with "artistic conception" (on the whole, black physique can be said to be the most developed, with a good sense of muscle and proportion). We can see that no matter how skin color and appearance are different, this beauty still moves us. But the essence of this kind of beauty embodies a kind of "human nature" beauty, which is different from what we generally call instinctive aesthetics. Academic research on racial differences is often labeled as "scientific racism", such as Richard? Hernstein's bell curve, Philip? Race, Evolution and Behavior, Luo. Objectively and rationally, there are obvious anatomical differences and hormone level differences between races. Is it really just the result of our submission to "racial and cultural forces" that this "internal difference" leads to the difference in physical appearance? (It must be pointed out that the word "race" is more of a concept in early physical anthropology research. After the rise of molecular anthropology, this concept is gradually being dispelled, which is also a good thing in a sense. )