Is the person who repairs the statue not skilled enough? I don't think anyone would have thought that restoring an ancient statue could do this. In my opinion, there may be two main reasons why restorers give such a failed work. 1. The repairman didn't know what the statue looked like before it was destroyed, so he had to fix it according to his own ideas, so we saw it? Abstract? Statue. The repairman can't repair the statue at all, so he just changes it after taking the money. It doesn't matter how you change it anyway. The money has been got. Whatever the reason, the statue outside the bank building has been destroyed, and passers-by will probably only laugh when they see it.
Is there any official explanation for this? I don't think the government can sit back and do bad things with money. But unexpectedly, neither the boss of the bank nor the local government has any opinions on this matter. Do they like this new abstract statue? This is a bit ridiculous. Perhaps he was afraid of being accused by the masses, so the parties still dared not speak out. In any case, this meaningless reduction left a deep impression on people. Maybe in the future, the local government can take this place as a special tourist attraction.
Hundreds of years of art works have thus become funny works, and I really don't know whether to cry or laugh.