Current location - Plastic Surgery and Aesthetics Network - Plastic surgery and medical aesthetics - Intel's hd4000 and ATI's HD5650 are both good graphics cards. I read some articles that the HD4000 core graphics card is better than the HD5650.
Intel's hd4000 and ATI's HD5650 are both good graphics cards. I read some articles that the HD4000 core graphics card is better than the HD5650.
I can tell you for sure that the hd4000 is far behind the hd5650.

First of all, performance is more than running points.

Secondly, even if you look at the running results, you should compare them under the same conditions.

I have also seen an evaluation. First of all, in the test environment, the hd4000 is equipped with a cpu with a score of 19000+, and the hd5650 is equipped with a cpu with a score of 5900+. Are these two comparable? Even just looking at gpu scores will have a great impact. There are many inexplicable words in the evaluation. On the contrary, in the specific measured game, there is no comparison with the same game, and I don't know how to explain it.

In fact, it is obvious that nuclear display can't be compared with mid-range solo display, even if it was two years ago. Those evaluation articles were all written by gunmen. Just look at them and don't take it seriously.