Current location - Plastic Surgery and Aesthetics Network - Plastic surgery and medical aesthetics - After the death of a 4-year-old boy kindergarten in Zaozhuang, Shandong Province, how should family members correctly defend their rights?
After the death of a 4-year-old boy kindergarten in Zaozhuang, Shandong Province, how should family members correctly defend their rights?
On 20021April 14, some media reported that a four-year-old boy died "abnormally" in a kindergarten in Zaozhuang, Shandong Province. After the incident, the boy's guardian asked for the surveillance video of the kindergarten, but was told that the monitoring of the boy's class was broken!

The monitoring of the garden was neither bad early nor bad late, but it broke down at this time, and it broke down in the class where the accident happened. It was so strange. The death of a boy may not be that simple.

As for how family members should protect their rights, I don't think this is the key to the problem. At present, the focus of attention should be "whether the boy's death is related to the dereliction of duty in the kindergarten involved". What family members need most now is a "truth". Only when the truth comes out can they defend their rights according to the actual situation. The restoration of this truth can only be hoped for by the police.

Case review:

On April 2002 1414, Taierzhuang Branch of Zaozhuang Public Security Bureau issued a police report. According to the report, the bureau received an alarm on April 3 13: 23, saying that a boy died unexpectedly in a kindergarten in Guangjin Road, Taierzhuang District.

It is understood that the day before the incident, Kobayashi (pseudonym) had symptoms of a cold and runny nose, and Kobayashi's mother took him to the pharmacy to buy cold medicine. The next morning, Xiao Lin got up and drank a glass of milk, and was sent to kindergarten by his family. According to family members, the child was alive and kicking at that time.

At noon, Xiaolin's mother received a phone call from the kindergarten teacher, saying that Xiaolin's body was suddenly abnormal and her lips were purple. The family immediately rushed to the kindergarten and found Xiaolin's face bloodless and his hands drooping. There were no vital signs.

Xiao Lin's mother, who is anxious to save the child, is waiting for the ambulance with her child in her arms. The ambulance hasn't come yet, so she ran to the road and stopped. Fortunately, she met a kind person and took her mother and son to the hospital. Regrettably, after half an hour of rescue, Kobayashi failed to wake up.

"It's fine in the morning, why is it noon ..." Xiao Lin's family couldn't believe it was true. They were very sad. However, in addition to grief, the family wanted to find out the real cause of Chu Xiaolin's death, so they went to the kindergarten for monitoring and didn't want to be rejected by the garden.

In the online exposure video, Kobayashi's mother cried and said, "Let's lose our conscience, let's wait for a few hours, and the director didn't come. Is it a conscience? " The child is still lying in the funeral home. "

According to its introduction, until 8 o'clock or 9 o'clock that night, no one was sent by the garden. When the staff of the inspection team discussed the results, the family members waited for more than 4 hours and no one paid attention.

The author's point of view:

There are many doubts about this incident that need to be investigated:

First, garden monitoring.

Family members asked for investigation and monitoring. Why did the garden monitoring break down for no reason? Why did it break down as soon as something happened? Is it self-harm or man-made disaster?

Second, the boy suffocated.

If what the boy's family said is true, the boy's cause of death is abnormal and it is difficult to get rid of the garden.

Third, the attitude of the garden.

The students in the class died. They died at school. Not only did the garden not take the initiative to send people to hospitals and funeral homes to comfort the families of the deceased, but it also refused to meet the families of the deceased and refused to answer the phone. It was not until the police forced the garden to appear that the garden sent someone over! This move is unreasonable and inhuman, showing the indifference of human feelings! Doubt.

Netizen's guess is not entirely "malicious speculation", because similar events were staged as early as 20 18:

A boy in a kindergarten in Henan died because of heatstroke. His family asked to see the monitoring, and the garden responded that the school monitoring was broken. It was confirmed by the police that the boy was left in the school bus that day and died unexpectedly. The garden was afraid that it would take responsibility, so it deleted the monitoring content.

It can be seen that speculation is necessary, and the truth can only be sought after speculation. I hope that the police will treat it fairly, restore the truth as soon as possible, and never wronged a good person, but never let go of a bad person.