Current location - Plastic Surgery and Aesthetics Network - Plastic surgery and medical aesthetics - A girl in Jinan complained of plastic surgery failure and was threatened by hospital shareholders. How should this medical and beauty institution defend its rights?
A girl in Jinan complained of plastic surgery failure and was threatened by hospital shareholders. How should this medical and beauty institution defend its rights?
If this hospital wants to protect its rights, it must first prove that it has not made any mistakes.

I. Foreword With the development of economy, people's living conditions are getting better and better, so people's general aesthetic level is getting higher and higher, and the development of science and technology has also given human beings more opportunities to become beautiful.

Plastic surgery is a very good opportunity to make yourself beautiful, especially for women.

However, although cosmetic surgery can bring beauty to itself, it also has high risks. In real life, some people lose money because of plastic surgery failure, and even make their looks strange.

Chen Xiao of Jinan took the plastic surgery hospital to court this year because of the failure of plastic surgery. However, Xiao Chen's road to safeguarding rights is not smooth, because the plastic surgery institutions not only constantly shirk their responsibilities, but also an unknown shareholder member privately threatened Xiao Chen to withdraw the lawsuit.

What is even more ridiculous is that the plastic surgery organization thinks that it is a victim and asks Chen Xiao for a reverse claim.

Second, the rights of cosmetic institutions are unreasonable. If this plastic surgery agency wants the so-called? Defend rights? First of all, I must provide evidence to prove that my operation did not fail. Xiao Chen's cosmetic surgery was successful, but until today, this cosmetic institution has not provided strong evidence.

According to this, can this cosmetic institution succeed? Defend rights? The probability is basically zero.

Second, the rights of cosmetic institutions are unreasonable. Second, Xiao Chen's cosmetic sequelae are very obvious, which have affected her basic life. Xiao Chen was afraid to go out because she felt humiliated.

Although the cosmetic surgery agency claimed that Xiao Chen's facial discomfort was due to his recovery, Xiao Chen had gone to another cosmetic surgery agency and hospital for consultation, and learned that this adverse reaction was due to the possibility of surgery failure.

Even at the end of the day, if the cosmetic agency asks Chen Xiaojing for identification, Xiao Chen is more likely to fail in cosmetic surgery. Therefore, it is unlikely that the claim for compensation from cosmetic agencies will be recognized.

To sum up, plastic surgery institutions should not shirk their responsibilities, but should carry out meaningless? Defend rights? It is the most reasonable to deal with Xiao Chen's claim for rights protection actively.

If you have anything to add, please leave your thoughts in the comments section below!