First of all, I want to talk about this problem. The woman was paralyzed by acupuncture and electrotherapy, leaving only her brain awake. She went to the clinic instead of the hospital for treatment.

The doctor who saw him was a doctor of traditional Chinese medicine, Dr. Lu, who was over 70 years old, not an expert professor or specialist director of a hospital. Therefore, this responsibility is not on the hospital, but on the doctors who practice medicine and do acupuncture and electrotherapy.

The distribution of responsibilities here can be divided into:

First, the patient herself: After spinal surgery, she did not follow the doctor's advice to do related rehabilitation, but listened to her relatives and went to a clinic to find the so-called old Chinese medicine practitioner for acupuncture and electrotherapy. She herself is responsible for such a medical accident. Because her performance after spinal surgery can be regarded as a good recovery, which is a medical accident caused by her going to electrotherapy.

Second, her relatives. Because blind recommendation makes patients listen to the so-called folk remedies or electric shock treatment, this is the result of total paralysis. Her relatives at least have some guiding factors in it.

Third, the biggest responsibility is the doctors in the clinic. Whether he has a license or not, whether he is qualified to practice medicine, and whether his clinic has relevant qualifications and certificates, this medical accident is caused by him. That's for sure. No amount of sophistry can change this fact.

Besides, the doctors in this clinic. After the reporter comes to the door, he can express the attitude that "asking for money is not fatal". This is no longer a qualified doctor. The doctor's medical ethics, he didn't.

So this pot should not be carried by the hospital, but by the clinic. There is still a difference between a clinic and a hospital.