Six-year-old boy died after being bitten by a dog. Two years ago, Fengfeng (pen name), a six-year-old boy from Wuhu, Anhui Province, was tackled by a black dog and bit his face. Although the child was immediately taken to the hospital for rescue, he died of rabies a few days later. Later, the child's parents sued the dog owner's house, the property management company and the hospital where he was treated. As soon as the court heard the case, the three defendants jointly compensated the relatives of the victim for more than 780,000 yuan, and the three defendants refused to accept the appeal. On April 28, 20 19, the judgment of the second instance of this case: the appeal was rejected and the procuratorate protested, which was the final judgment.
The parents of the children appealed, and the lively and cheerful children were gone. She Chao's family was deeply saddened. Subsequently, she Chao and his wife brought the dog's owners, Li Moumou and Mou Moumou, their subsidiaries in Wuhu, Shenzhen Huaqiang North Property Management Service Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Huaqiang North Property Management Service Co., Ltd., and their first-class mountain hospital in Bengbu Medical College to court, and clearly appealed: the five defendants together with compensation for the appellant's losses totaled 79 1384.62 yuan.
2065438+On August 3, 2008, the people's court of Jinghu District of Wuhu City ruled that the defendant dog owner Wang compensated the appellant for various losses totaling 273 102 yuan. Wuhu subsidiary of Shenzhen Huaqiang North Property Management Service Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Huaqiang North Property Management Service Co., Ltd. compensated the appellant for various losses totaling 156058. 12 yuan defendant Yijishan Hospital compensated the appellant for various losses totaling 35131yuan, totaling 78029/kloc.
After the first-instance judgment of the defendant's failed appeal case, the defendant was not convinced and filed an appeal. After the first-instance judgment of this case, netizens were obviously concerned. Some netizens expressed sympathy and regret for the children who are far away from home, and expressed their own suggestions on raising animals in residential areas. On April 28th, five and a half months after the second trial, the case finally entered the judgment. At 8 o'clock in the morning, many parents, She Chao and Yang Fabing, rushed outside the court. In addition, the dog owner's family, property management and hospital defense lawyers involved in this case also appeared in court. At 9 o'clock in the morning, the judgment of the second instance of the case: the investigation report of our court is consistent with the objective facts assessed by the ruling of the original trial, the evidence assessed by the court of first instance is conclusive, the law is properly applied, the appeal is rejected, and the procuratorate protests.
Although the child has been dead for two years, the owner and the property manager of the dog have never apologized at home, not even a simple apology. The mother of the child has been living in sadness because she misses the child too much.
Although the boy's parents finally got compensation, the devastation caused by the child's death may make them never get out of that painful situation. None of this can be compensated by money. Only the passage of time can wash away their wounds from the spiritual essence. For this matter, the boy's mother burst into tears for the camera and said with tears, "I am looking forward to holding the rope and taking care of my dog." The boy's mother appealed to the whole world.
Update 1: Sorry.
Wankc999: Actually, I'm a novice.
So I don't know much about