Why is there such a "spicy eye" employment standard? The business owners around me told me that for enterprises, female employees need paid holidays and allowances when they are pregnant, and they can't participate in labor during maternity leave. This is a cost for enterprises. Therefore, in order to reduce this cost, some enterprises violate the relevant provisions of the labor law in a disguised and self-righteous way. For the employed, if they find this unfair phenomenon, they can actively protect themselves, report this behavior and purify the employment environment. Therefore, I like this news and thank many media for forwarding the report, making this move easier for employers and regulatory authorities to see.
When we had a meeting this morning, Xiao Yang from the office said that although he didn't give priority to gender in his previous interview, in practice, in addition to recruiting men, only single women were recruited, and the supplementary contract also stated that it was not allowed to get married and have children for several years. Their boss said that women who have boyfriends can't be recruited, because they have to think about marriage and childbirth soon, so they don't have more energy to devote to their work. What's more, unmarried and childless women will not be recruited. They could get pregnant at any time. If you have children, in addition to maternity leave and company subsidies, mothers have to take care of their children's food and drink, not hard.
In fact, in addition to this typical gender discrimination in recruitment, there are also invisible recruitment discrimination such as age, region and education. Based on the consideration of cost, employers often choose candidates with higher "cost performance". In recent years, with the popularization of higher education and vocational education and the delay of employees' retirement years, a recruiter market has gradually formed in the labor market. More and more employees need a job, which makes the enterprise stand in the position of a picker. In the choice of qualified personnel, choose the one with lower cost. Controlling the cost of employing people conforms to the essence of commercial profit-seeking, but enterprises have not undertaken corresponding social obligations. Moreover, this kind of "invisible discrimination" is difficult to obtain evidence and the relevant laws and regulations are missing. In addition, many employees do not know enough, and there is still a long way to go to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests.