In the face of material composition, many candidates fail to really understand the material and master the methods of examining questions and refining opinions, which often leads to the major mistakes that the refined opinions and materials are at arm's length, specious, far apart, or even far apart? Even if the structure of your article is rigorous, the argument is full, the examples are rich, and the language is beautiful, it can only be? Is it a waste of wax for the blind to light a lamp? Yes It can be seen that it is very important to refine the viewpoint of material composition. Then, how can we thoroughly understand the materials, closely follow the materials, choose a good angle, and establish a quite innovative and profound point of view? The following methods are for your reference.

First, the finishing touch

In recent years, when institutions assess this part of the composition, they are basically propositional or semi-propositional compositions. In other words, the stem will contain some contents, but these contents are the general argument or the keywords in the general argument, and the keywords in the stem will be separated by the method of stem. By refining, analyzing and splitting the keywords of the topic, we can get the general argument or sub-argument.

Second, the material winning method

If you find the key words in the stem, or there is less content in the stem, you should go back to the material, sort out the material, find the core point, supplement or further judge the general argument, sort out the material and select the sub-argument.

(1) material core words? High-level words and high-frequency words

(2) Material core sentence? Sentences related to or explaining the theme, sentences expressing opinions

(3) Material core segment? Generally, the first and last paragraphs, especially the last paragraph, have paragraphs with viewpoint materials.

(4) Text integration method? The key point is to sort out ideas according to the logical mind map of the whole material and find the total score argument.

Third, the optimization of sub-arguments

1, sub-argument word optimization:

Attraction, cohesion, driving force, radiation

Boosters, catalysts, accelerators and new engines

Pioneer, leader, leader

Soil, seeds, roots and veins

Soul, Root and Essence

New space, new vision, new engine

Fundamental foothold, important focus and strategic focus

Healthy qi, strong backbone, tonic qi.

Self-confidence, self-awareness and self-improvement

Self-knowledge, self-discipline and introspection

The key to self-cultivation, the way to get along, the foundation of career and the foundation of success.

2. Optimization of sub-argument sentences: sub-argument sentences are written neatly to ensure obvious marks.

The donkey crossed the river carrying salt. It slipped and fell into the water. When the salt melts, it is much lighter to stand up. This makes it very happy. Another day, it took a sponge to the river, deliberately slipped and fell into the water. The sponge sucked the water away, so the donkey couldn't stand up and finally drowned.

This fable tells us that everything should proceed from reality, and when the situation changes, our thinking and working methods will also change. If we stick to the rules or blindly apply them, we will inevitably fail. When writing, we should grasp its meaning through the appearance of donkey carrying salt sponge, and take it as the argument of the article.