But this case is a complicated case, involving not only children, but also a murder case and another family? Is it fair? . The child's father, Chen Mou, was sentenced to death for murdering his wife and mother-in-law. During this period, he sold his house to Wang for 550,000 yuan. However, because the ownership of the house was still owned, Wang refused to accept it, but was sentenced to death. Finally, he took his daughter, the most innocent girl, to court. Finally, the nine-year-old orphan girl became Lao Lai and was restricted from high consumption.
Although it seems reasonable in law, from a humanitarian point of view, it makes no sense at all. First of all, although Wang has not obtained the ownership of the house, he has the right to use it, and he also made a profit of more than 300,000 yuan by renting the house. It's inhuman to sue at this time. Wang keeps talking about himself? Free? I gave more than 500,000 yuan, but during this period, Wang also made a profit of 300,000 yuan, so the real loss was only more than 200,000 yuan, and the right to use it was still in Wang's hand, and he could make a profit by renting a house in the future.
Considering the death of her child's parents, she was only nine years old, and decided to sue the girl, making her an old lai to limit high consumption. Does conscience hurt?
In Wang, I saw his selfish and extremely indifferent human nature. Should the conflict between parents be paid by children? In my opinion, no, there is a view in my family that no matter how big the contradiction between the two families is, it has nothing to do with children. Even if adults never communicate with each other, they will still treat each other's children warmly when they come to their home to play with their children. This is the principle that hatred will not be passed down from generation to generation. I think it makes sense. No matter what conflicts between adults, children are innocent. Why don't we stick to it?