At present, the daily diagnosis, treatment and rescue work of the hospital faces many bottlenecks, but the work of the hospital is to save lives, and ordinary patients cannot be left untreated and become positive cases. This principled concept needs the real attention of hospital administrators, so as to lay a solid foundation for ensuring the safety of ordinary patients. As long as this concept is not supported, similar tragedies will emerge one after another during the epidemic. Without a correct understanding in thought, the health of ordinary patients can not be guaranteed. The epidemic prevention rules and regulations formulated by the hospital seem strict, but at the expense of the vital interests of ordinary patients. This is also a backward concept that needs to be reversed. In addition, it needs to be improved from the following aspects, so as to effectively protect the life safety of ordinary patients.

First, give doctors the power to treat critically ill patients flexibly. After all, only front-line doctors know the patient's condition best, but many hospitals are limited to epidemic prevention and control. The introduction of various epidemic prevention policies has led to doctors' hands tied in their daily diagnosis and treatment work, which is also the chief culprit for many ordinary patients to fail to see a doctor normally. Only by authorizing doctors to meet the needs of ordinary patients for medical treatment and treatment can they take treatment measures at the first time. I believe that most front-line doctors have the same view, but the hospital turns a blind eye to it. Only by thoroughly improving and paying enough attention to the interests of ordinary patients can we really play a guarantee role in the daily work of hospitals.

Second, hospital leaders take turns on duty at the scene, which is also the basic premise to ensure the safety of ordinary patients. During the period of epidemic prevention and control, many hospitals only carry out epidemic prevention mechanically, ignoring that the patient's condition will not disappear. Once the condition worsens, the leader on duty needs to make emergency dispatch to avoid dull and blunt epidemic prevention measures delaying the normal treatment of patients. If there is no leader with decision-making power at the scene, only ordinary medical staff have no right and courage to challenge epidemic prevention measures, then it is particularly necessary for the hospital to formulate a duty system for relevant leaders.

Third, in case of critically ill patients who need emergency treatment, epidemic prevention measures should be flexibly adjusted according to specific diseases and treatment conditions. To sum up, the life safety of ordinary patients is equally important, but during the epidemic period, in order to get real protection, the hospital, as a specific responsible unit, should make corresponding changes from concept to system to avoid the tragedy that ordinary patients cannot be treated in time because of epidemic prevention. In addition, setting up a higher-level isolation ward to treat those critically ill patients who can't get the nucleic acid report temporarily can also reduce the man-made or accidental mortality.