Current location - Plastic Surgery and Aesthetics Network - Plastic surgery and medical aesthetics - The per capita GDP of China and Brazil is very close, but why is the infrastructure so different?
The per capita GDP of China and Brazil is very close, but why is the infrastructure so different?
In 20 18, China's per capita GDP was 8900 dollars; In 20 18, Brazil's per capita GDP exceeded $65,438+0,000.

That year was the first time that China surpassed Brazil in per capita GDP. According to the growth and deceleration of the two countries, the gap between China and Brazil will obviously increase. You know, in 20 18, Brazil's per capita GDP was only 67% of that in 20 12.

Although the per capita GDP of the two countries has started to fall behind, when China people look at Brazil, they really think that its infrastructure is not as good as ours. To tell the truth, our great motherland has spoiled us, which is a typical illusion. Not to mention a developing country like Brazil, even among the developed countries in the world, China's infrastructure construction is among the best.

Then the question is, why can a country like China complete large-scale infrastructure construction, but developing countries like India and Brazil can't? System problem, or system problem.

One characteristic of China is that we have dual political and economic sovereignty, which is attributed to a group of outstanding, self-reliant sages and hard-working people at the beginning of the founding of the People's Republic of China. Now we are all controlled by state-owned companies in enterprises related to the lifeline of the national economy and people's livelihood, and we can go to some remote and extremely underdeveloped areas to invest in infrastructure construction without cost. What about Brazil and India? In fact, their sovereignty is incomplete, their economic lifeline is controlled by multinational companies, and the political superstructure is just a puppet.

Therefore, it is still a question whether their decrees can be controlled at the grassroots level and whether they can leave the capital. The whole society is here? Highly developed autonomous prefecture? Medium. Some people say that this state of autonomy is good? I don't see any pity for human rights in developing countries from the bottom gangs and multinational companies in Brazil. Drugs are rampant, the legal system is eroded and crimes are everywhere. Ordinary people live in a dark environment and are always in fear. Do you think this autonomy is good? I really don't know where your ass has gone, the city on the top of the mountain?

It is precisely because they do not have complete independence and sovereignty that they cannot stimulate domestic demand, stimulate employment and slow down the gap between the east and the west by investing in large-scale infrastructure construction, and their inflated per capita GDP is only a sign of the gap between the rich and the poor, which only shows that they have a pro-European upper class, and they have made huge profits as agents of western developed countries.

It can be seen from the development of Brazil that developing countries often adopt pro-capital policies in the process of industrialization, and capital often comes from western developed countries. Once sovereignty is incomplete, it will be infiltrated by the whole. The superstructure has become the spokesman of western capital, and class contradictions are intensifying. At the same time, the state can neither alleviate the class contradictions transferred from the process of industrialization in the west, nor establish a welfare system.

From the case of Brazil, we should also see that the so-called copying of the political and economic models of western developed countries will only result in a puppet!