What's wrong with counterfeiting? Why not support it? Is it necessary to let fakes run wild all over the world? Don't let fake goods harm the people? Is it harmful to the health of people and children? Don't let unscrupulous merchants produce fakes to exploit the people? Since ancient times, for fakes. In particular, counterfeit drugs kill people for money, which is abhorrent. So people all over the world will support counterfeiting. However, it does not support personal profiteering in the name of counterfeiting. Support justice and truly fight counterfeiting. Let the fakes escape!
If the relevant departments can do their duty to crack down on counterfeiting and prevent the proliferation of counterfeiting, is there still room for professional counterfeiters to survive? No matter what the purpose of professional counterfeiters is, it has played an objective role in curbing counterfeiting, which is in the interests of the vast majority of consumers and should be supported and regulated according to law. To tell the truth, it is far from enough to rely on only a few people in the relevant full-time departments of the government under the reality of counterfeiting in the current market. If the relevant government departments are regular anti-counterfeiting troops, then professional anti-counterfeiting guerrillas are the support and supplement to the regular troops. The actual effect is consistent with cracking down on counterfeiting and protecting consumers' rights and interests.
As long as they are rational consumers, they will support professional counterfeiting.
As long as it is a country ruled by law, it should also support professional counterfeiting.
Because no matter whether consumers are counterfeiting or professional counterfeiting, they are playing "real fakes" instead of real goods.
Opposing professional counterfeiting is, in a sense, connivance of fake goods and injustice to real goods.
The CCTV Spring Festival Evening program "Counterfeiting" is also a person who praises professional counterfeiters and protects consumers' rights and interests.
I personally strongly support it.
No matter what the purpose is, as long as the results are achieved, it is a good thing for the people.
I don't know what the relevant departments think. I remember that a new regulation was introduced earlier-the fake one accompanied by ten stipulated by the consumer law does not apply to shopping that is not for use. )
The introduction of this regulation is obviously aimed at professional counterfeiters and consumers who know the real goods and deliberately buy fakes. What is the result? Because you can't get compensation for the purpose of claim, you must be knowledgeable to buy it back. If you don't know how to get it back, you don't know that you bought a fake. Even if you know, it's not worth claiming for a small piece. Then the price paid by merchants and counterfeiters is very small. Compared with the profits made by counterfeiters and forgers, they occasionally lose one or two, that is, nine Niu Yi cents.
We all hate fakes and want to spend the same money to buy better products. But why are fakes repeatedly banned?
The key is that the illegal cost is too low.
It must be angry to shoot if you catch it. Naturally impossible, it won't work. Then, if we vigorously support professional counterfeiters and then drive the whole people to participate in counterfeiting, can we fundamentally eliminate them?
If possible, support professional counterfeiters or every consumer, whether they buy them for their own use or not, as long as they are fakes, no matter how much they buy, they will operate according to the rule of "fake one loses ten", so there will be no fakes in the market soon.
Some people argue that this provision was made several years ago, but fakes are still rampant. How do you explain it?
In fact, it is very simple, mainly because it is very difficult for ordinary people to identify the authenticity of products without professional knowledge.
Professional counterfeiters are different.
For example, supporting employees in quality inspection and industrial and commercial departments to buy fakes in their own names, losing money is personal income, and then how the relevant departments punish them, is this very powerful? These people check the circulation field in the market every day, are trained to identify fakes, and have personal income after work. Isn't it killing two birds with one stone?
Some people say, what if these comrades take advantage of their position to call a deer a horse and insist that it is false?
It's very simple. As long as the goods purchased are regular bills, the seller is not a counterfeiter, and the bills and purchase channels are provided, other things will naturally be investigated and dealt with by the relevant departments, which has nothing to do with my small dealer. Big deal. I just work with you.
Today, I read the draft of the new "Administrative Measures for Letters and Calls Reporting" for comments! The core of everyone's dispute is Article 22! The specific contents are as follows: "Article 22 If a complainant or whistleblower abuses his rights in order to safeguard his legitimate rights and interests or stop illegal acts, and repeatedly, massively and maliciously submits complaints and reports, which interferes with the normal work of the market supervision department, the market supervision department shall strictly grasp the acceptance criteria of his complaints and reports."
Personally, this article has several problems:
1. What does it mean to strictly grasp the acceptance criteria for complaints and reports? What is this standard? Is it a written standard? Is it an open standard? Why can standards be "strict"? Let's not talk about what is a "professional counterfeiter". Let's make this clear first! Otherwise, it gives the market management department too much discretion and increases the space for selective law enforcement!
Two, "what is the standard of abuse of power? What kind of situation is abuse? What is a malicious petition? Be grateful for the reports and complaints of violators? What is repetition? What do you mean a lot? 2 times or 100 times? Why can't complaints and reports of violations be repeated?
3. How does the accepting department know the complainant's purpose? By guessing?
In a short period of time, there are so many vague things that there is no objective identification standard. The final result will inevitably provide a legal basis for the administrative department to seek rent. I am afraid that if the complained business is the object to be protected, it will resolutely refuse to accept it. If it is the object of disobedience, it is a blow!
Therefore, my suggestion is that, in addition, all reports and complaints that are not accepted must be publicized on the prescribed website and subject to the supervision of the media and the masses, so that everyone can understand various reasons, instead of hanging around in a jar!
I support professional counterfeiters, and no one cares about fakes. No matter what the purpose of professional counterfeiters is, they have done a good thing for the people and punished those who sell fake goods and make fakes. No one dares to sell fakes and make fakes in the future.
I also support it, for the people!
Many years ago, a group of "professional counterfeiters" with professional counterfeiting as their specialty appeared in people's field of vision.
However, the controversy over this group of "professional counterfeiters" has been mixed. As the Supreme People's Court put forward the idea of "gradually restricting the profit-making activities of professional counterfeiters" and was publicly criticized as a "professional claimant", professional counterfeiters are undergoing a policy change.
2065438+June 2004, the Supreme People's Court issued a judicial interpretation, which made it clear that "if there is a dispute over the quality of food and medicine, the buyer claims rights from the producers and sellers, and the producers and sellers make a defense on the grounds that the buyer still buys the food and medicine knowing that there are quality problems, the people's court will not support it".
2065438+In May 2007, the General Office of the Supreme People's Court, in response to a suggestion made by a NPC deputy, said that the Supreme People's Court adopted a classified attitude towards "professional counterfeiting" and gradually curbed it. According to the statement in the "Reply", the Supreme People's Court "may consider gradually restricting the profit-making anti-counterfeiting behavior of professional counterfeiters outside the purchase of food and medicine".
Since then, the policy vane of professional counterfeiters has changed. The newspaper that the professional counterfeiter saw when he was sentenced to lose the case.
With more and more cases of professional counterfeiters suing professional counterfeiters, the identity of professional counterfeiters is increasingly questioned by all sectors of society.
In view of the fact that these professional counterfeiting cases are easy to lose, some professional counterfeiters have the idea of hiding their identities and temporarily retiring during the trial of court cases.
The country's legal system is gradually improving and perfecting, and it is time to test every citizen's enjoyment and exercise of legitimate rights and interests according to law. However, if you maliciously counterfeit in the name of counterfeiting and exchange personal interests at the expense of breaking the law, then your behavior is suspected of breaking the law and should be punished by law.
Only by keeping the moral bottom line and not being driven by interests. Only under the premise of abiding by laws and regulations, putting forward legitimate opinions and demands in a reasonable and compliant manner is the sunny road that every citizen should take.
Professional counterfeiting should be the responsibility of the Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision, but it is not effective. Therefore, there have been "professional counterfeiters" among the people, also known as "professional counterfeiters". The purpose of counterfeiters is to trap consumers into making money. Counterfeiters find fakes to earn compensation, but at the same time expose fake and inferior products to make other consumers less fooled. This should be a good thing, so it needs support rather than suppression.