There is a loophole in the story of Meng Jiangnv crying at the Great Wall. She got married because she saw Meng leaking her neck while saving Fan, so she married him. This pedantic behavior was definitely earlier than when Confucianism was the only thing in the Han Dynasty, and it was more likely after the Song Dynasty, which was not the folk custom in the pre-Qin period at all.

The mystery is, why so many? Li Ming is a clever instrument, Zhuang Ling? Regardless? Version? Don't know Hanfu circle? Shanzhai? People who define complex color and pattern design instead of some versions and well-known all shapes also preach the meaninglessness of Hanfu shapes and antiques below.

It is wrong to be more conservative as far away as possible. I'm afraid the Ming and Qing Dynasties were the most physically and mentally imprisoned times in China's feudal era. An ordinary person is not allowed to travel at will unless there are official documents. Before the Yuan and Song Dynasties, ordinary people could trade freely. Have you ever heard of the Ming and Qing Dynasties? The Silk Road? Really?

When I was a child, I was in the countryside, and the national economy was not good in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Many women who work in the countryside wear sweatshirts and cropped trousers without underwear. At that time, there was no underwear to buy in places with poor economy, and only rich people in the city bought underwear. After a day of farm work in summer, I came home without air conditioning. It's hot, so I naturally wear less clothes at home to enjoy the cool. Now every family in the countryside has air conditioning, and no one cultivates land. Everyone's choice of clothes is not based on the convenience of going to work, or what clothes to wear, which are long and short, and the styles are obviously much more.

I was born in the late 1980s. I have seen my grandmother wearing a cotton-padded jacket with diagonal buttons in winter. I have also seen her wearing only a large white cotton undershirt in summer. It is very hot in summer. It's convenient to work in this sweatshirt, which absorbs sweat and is cool. At that time, rural productivity in China was still relatively backward. Eating enough and wearing warm clothes is the first priority. Our hometown is in the plain, and village-run enterprises were gradually established at that time. Not particularly poor rural areas (40 kilometers from the provincial capital city). Later 1995, the economy advanced by leaps and bounds, and clothes styles became more and more abundant. Obviously, with air conditioning, they no longer work in the fields (more and more enterprises and villagers work in factories, but less in the fields). What are they like? Conservative? Now more people wear long skirts, and they no longer worry that long skirts are not practical and inconvenient to go to work.

In fact, many people can't imagine and feel this change. This is not a single phenomenon. This was a common phenomenon in the whole country at that time. Most people may not know what life was like for most people in China before 1990. They can only see the circles around them, let alone understand the living environment and life of ordinary people at the bottom of ancient times. Just because clothes can transmit light does not mean that clothes are not multi-layered warp and weft.

Because ordinary cloth is transparent, workers are exposed to light because their clothes are wet with sweat, and they bump because they are thin. Most single clothes will be like this after getting wet, which obviously cannot be used as a standard to judge their manufacturing process. Different solar terms dress differently. A worker wears casual clothes in the factory, so won't he wear formal clothes on other occasions? Most of the clothes merchants in the Ming Dynasty bought goods from the countryside, and it was obvious that farmers had the technology to make different kinds of clothes, which was also obvious in the old countryside. Now many inheritors of intangible technology are in rural areas. Since they can be masters' clothes, the only restrictions on whether they can wear masters' clothes are financial resources and status (forbidden).

Let's go back to the question of form. What determines the form? Actual demand determines the form. Clothes are a by-product of society. In other words, when you discuss the form, I just acquiesce that you have admitted the above facts (that is, my comments on this passage), and then we will talk about the social and cultural problems of clothing. Based on this understanding, we go to see the clothes of primitive people to serve the needs of production and life. When we went to see the Shang and Zhou Dynasties, we also had a lot of short clothes, and on this basis, we developed aristocratic clothes. I've been talking about civilian clothes. It's just that most people don't pay attention or pretend to understand. Clothes are developed on the basis of practicality, so the clothes of ordinary people in the past may become the routine dress of modern people. For example, the prototype of a suit used to be casual clothes for urban civilians, and later it became a dress. Today's Tang costume is developed from the smocks of the former working people, and the former round neck robes have now become costumes. This kind of thing has happened throughout the ages.

So when we talk about clothes, we must understand that clothes are not people, and people can be divided into fixed class opposites, but clothes are not. Except for special jobs, there has never been a kind of clothes worn by civilians and rich people since ancient times. Exclusive clothes for x people? Usually only exists in one place at a time. But before the clothes are well matched, we can't ignore the patterns and materials on the clothes, and only look at the styles (shapes) of the clothes to draw a conclusion. Whether casual wear will be transparent does not mean openness or indifference. Opening is to open, whether the vest undershirt is normal or generally airtight. Opening is to show your figure or other purposes, which is why Indian women think that tight jeans are open, while traditional Indian clothes are not. Because everyone knows that there are occasions, not all occasions. History is a living pluralistic body.

Pack a bag of dynasties, kidnapping historical materials and ancient people to prove something that doesn't exist at all? This is what I saw, right? Hanfu? The most essential and distinctive judgment. I hope more history professionals can come out, trace back to the source, attack this industry that desecrates history and distorts culture, and give theoretical support to the silent majority. In order to expand its interests, Hanfu industry subverts itself from the national historical view, and children already think that this thing is the product of history. It's time for history to change, right? Hanfu? Always disdain correction and silence.