First: Uniqlo doesn't prohibit adults from trying on children's clothes, but if they just shoot and don't buy them, then these people need to pay for their actions. There is really no explicit stipulation that adults can't wear children's clothes, because the maximum size of some children's clothes is really suitable for adults, especially some women's children's clothes. So adults can be allowed to try on children's clothes, but this is only for consumers who really need to buy them. There is an atmosphere of shooting videos now. Many people will go to Uniqlo to try on clothes and recommend their serial numbers to attract fans.
And some people also like adults to wear children's clothes, and then make a video recommendation and don't buy it themselves. These people are very hateful. No matter how long it takes to shoot a video in the fitting room, if you recommend it to fans after the test, you won't buy it yourself. But also damaged clothes, such behavior is not basic moral literacy. Children know that damage to other people's things needs compensation, let alone adults.
Even if someone's can is broken in the supermarket, the customer who damaged the can still needs to pay for the can, not to mention a piece of clothing. It is destructive for adults to try on children's clothes. If it really fits, forget it. If it's inappropriate, you can force your way in, which will damage your clothes. Moreover, the neckline of children's clothes is very small, and it is very likely that cosmetics will be rubbed on the clothes when trying them on, so the clothes will not be sold. If there is such behavior, the person who tries it on will naturally pay the price for his behavior.
Second: merchants should not take the blame for consumers' behavior. In the fast-moving clothing industry, although there are many waiters in the store, it is impossible for the waiters to check the clothes that customers try on one by one. Therefore, if adults try on children's clothes and cause damage, the clerk can't check it out immediately. Therefore, if you try on damaged clothes at ordinary times, it will be detected afterwards. If someone thinks that since it was not found at that time, then it must be the clerk and the merchant who paid the bill themselves, which is a bit unreasonable.
If you do such a thing, it is equivalent to doing something bad, but some people don't find it, which is allowed. Which parent dares to convey such values to their children? Obviously this is not correct. Since your behavior has caused losses to others, others have no responsibility to pay for it, and others have no obligation to help you. Therefore, if you find that the clothes are damaged, you still have to take the initiative to pay the bill.