A marriage certificate has been fixed for a lifetime, and we have since entered the besieged city of marriage. Fortunately or unfortunately, it will be a lifetime thing. So someone asked: Why can't you sign an engagement and be a marriage contract worker? However, some people say that if marriage is to be maintained in the form of contract, isn't love and responsibility sealed in a secret corner? ■ Guide what a contractual marriage is. In modern urban life, trial marriage is nothing new. While people have long been accustomed to trial marriage, a kind of "contract marriage" is quietly emerging. Some people think that "contract" is the most effective in commercial society. Therefore, it is more mature, more serious, more responsible and more binding to put on a "tightening spell" for trial marriage. Others think that it is ridiculous and incomprehensible to introduce commercial content into marriage, the emotional "representative". Contract marriage is a life state between legal marriage and cohabitation, which is neither legal marriage nor common cohabitation. Specifically, during the validity of the contract, both parties shall perform all relevant responsibilities and obligations in accordance with the standards of the current marriage law. When the contract expires and both parties decide not to renew it, the relevant responsibilities and obligations will be eliminated. If it is decided to renew the contract, the above related terms will continue to be fulfilled. Of course, the relevant content is not absolute, and some relevant "terms" should be drawn up voluntarily by both parties. Of course, "responsibilities and obligations" may not be involved. As a new form of marriage, contract marriage was legalized in France at the end of 1999. This is a new marriage system between traditional marriage and cohabitation. The founders of contract marriage may be French philosophers Sartre and Beauvoir. When Sartre said to Beauvoir, "Let's sign a two-year agreement." This form of marriage, which was officially recognized by the French government 70 years later, was born at that time. At that time, Sartre explained that they don't have to get married, but they are the closest life partners. While sincerely loving each other, they each maintain their own independence and freedom. Get together if you support the point of view, and disperse if you disagree. Ms. Lu, general manager of Kunming Science and Technology Co., Ltd., this method is quite good, and I agree with it very much. Love is not only emotional sustenance, but also involves the integration of many aspects other than emotion. "Contract marriage" leaves room for running-in and observation, and everyone has an agreement with each other on the premise of equality and voluntariness. Within the agreed scope, they can continue to get along. If it goes beyond the agreed scope, it can be dissolved automatically without interference. For example, what is acceptable and what is unforgivable, so that you can give each other a clear principle of doing things at the beginning of cohabitation, which will reduce a lot of unhappiness caused by doing things. Moreover, in terms of personality and dealing with people, if you pass the test of the agreed time, you can accept it, and it will bring you some help, thinking that you can extend the life time of * * * *, then the two can re-plan and agree to continue for several years; Or simply get a marriage certificate with confidence, so that this "small contract" becomes a formal "big contract", which is legal and more secure. But if it doesn't feel right, then you can cancel the "contract", don't be sad, and find your own happiness. What is the marriage of the owner of a women's clothing store in Beichen District, Yang Lina? In fact, marriage itself is a contract, and a contract is a marriage certificate. Different from other "contracts", the life expectancy of marriage is a lifetime. It should be a pleasant thing to be able to carry out this marriage in stages with the expectation of "a lifetime", which is accumulated from two years, three years and five years. Just like paying back the loan by stages after buying a house loan, pressure and motivation coexist, but the motivation is often greater than the pressure. Because you have to work hard to make money and pay off your mortgage, you must act. "Contract marriage" shortens the expected life and gives people a sense of freshness. Both parties will cherish it even more when they think that they have only two or three years to get along. If they cherish it, they will keep the feeling of love every day. In this way, we often won't quarrel over trivial matters, and it's not easy to hurt our feelings. Therefore, the possibility of dissolving the "contract" in the middle will become smaller, while the possibility of renewing it will increase, making it easy to enter the marriage hall. Guo Xiaoliang, a surgeon in a hospital in Kunming, is firmly opposed to this practice. If two people really love each other and get a marriage certificate aboveboard, what's wrong with the protection of national laws? It's ridiculous to have to live together in this form. "Contract marriage" may really have its own advantages, such as freedom and low binding force. You don't have to think about what to do for each other all day to make them happier. But its form is not as formal as marriage certificate, and its legal effect is not as strong as marriage certificate. It is precisely because of the freedom of "contract marriage" that the two sides will deviate from each other's marriage consciousness. Every day, both sides will think about which agreement the other side has fulfilled, instead of thinking more about what I want to do for the other side. What should I do for this "home"? Immersing yourself in observation and "nitpicking" thoughts all day will contribute to family stability? So, what are these people living together in the form of "contract marriage" thinking? To put it bluntly, there is no plan to live a good life at all. This is just an excuse for some people to evade their responsibilities and obligations. It is futile to reinvent the wheel. I really don't know what the point is. If you don't want to get married, the process of living together is a good process of getting to know each other. Get together, get together, and break up if you don't agree. We don't have to talk about responsibilities or obligations, because they are not protected by law. If you want to get married, cohabitation will become a trial marriage. You will get along well during the trial marriage. If you feel good, imagine your future plans, when to get married, when to buy a house and so on. If we really understand it according to the definition, living together will fulfill the corresponding responsibilities and obligations. Isn't it futile to say "inappropriate" in the last sentence and then separate? I really don't understand the purpose of doing this. Expert opinion may be a supplement to traditional marriage and modern marriage. Qian An, a senior marriage counselor at Xinqiao Mental Health Research Institute in Kunming, talked about marriage, but had to talk about economy. The economic base determines the superstructure, and marriage and marriage law are the superstructure. With the economic transformation and the development of market economy, the old marriage law has fallen far behind, so the new marriage law was born. However, the new marriage law still lags behind the reality of social marriage. There are "cohabitation marriage", "contract marriage" and "lover phenomenon" in reality, which are not included in the marriage law. These phenomena are the products of the market economy and the new marriage concept. Due to the development of market economy, on the one hand, the traditional and modern views on marriage are almost untenable, on the other hand, the new views on marriage have not really been formed or finalized, but new marriage forms have emerged in various colors. The above-mentioned "cohabitation marriage", "contract marriage" and "lover phenomenon" are facts. It seems that the new Marriage Law has been implemented for so many years, and it should be supplemented with an "implementation rule" for easy operation. Therefore, some people conceive to formulate the Marriage Contract Law. Marriage contract law has the shadow of market economy-such as "contract" in labor contract law, but it does reflect the contractual relationship of marriage, which is of course different from "economic contract". Some cohabitants always feel that they are thieves, have no names, have no distinction, and have not informed the society, especially relatives and friends, in an open or formal form. Even if I don't feel like a thief, I still feel temporarily relaxed. So, someone thought of the contractual relationship outside the marriage law-"contractual marriage". Contract marriage is more mature, serious and responsible than trial marriage, but its legitimacy is weaker than legal marriage. So far, no one has talked about its morality and legitimacy. Although "the law does not protect", once something goes wrong, the law still has to intervene. After all, it is a civil dispute. Its original intention is to make husband and wife, spouse or a couple have the same responsibilities and obligations, both unity and division, and each has its own part of space or "oasis", and the other party cannot insert or interfere. "Contract marriage" has existed at present, which can be understood as a progress or evolution of "cohabitation marriage". Although naive, this is a "phenomenon" that has already appeared, challenging traditional morality and the current marriage law. Marriage law-detailed rules for the implementation of marriage law-contract marriage. Therefore, "contract marriage" may gradually form a supplement to traditional marriage and modern marriage in a period of criticism.