How can I put it? The problem of the Russian army has nothing to do with a minister or a soldier at all. It is simply a problem of Russian command. In addition, it is useless for the Russian armed forces to reuse a ministerial soldier. The minister's main strength is urban warfare. At that time, the Russian armed forces were in a defensive war and there was no need for ministerial soldiers at all. You can't let a ministerial soldier who is good at urban warfare go to the Ukrainian armed forces and have the cheek. That would be tantamount to letting the minister be a decoration. To put it bluntly, the reason why a ministerial soldier was so brave in previous urban wars was mainly because the Ukrainian armed forces at that time did not have heavy firepower. Now the Ukrainian armed forces are so powerful that you can't be taunted by a ministerial soldier. You hide in a building and fight a city war, and people directly adjust heavy guns to blow up your whole building. How to play urban warfare? So this matter has nothing to do with whether to reuse a minister or not.
There is a saying that this matter has nothing to do with the use of a minister or a soldier. It was the Russian military command that fell into the trap of the Ukrainian armed forces. In fact, it believed that the attack direction of the Ukrainian armed forces was the southern region, and most of the Russian troops were transferred to the southern region of Ukraine, resulting in a small number of Russian troops in Kharkov, Ukraine, and weak equipment. The Ukrainian armed forces seized the opportunity and directly launched the most violent attack, so the Russian armed forces were forced to retreat. This is an out-and-out strategic mistake, and it is simply a command problem of the Russian armed forces.
Generally speaking, the withdrawal of Ukrainian armed forces from the Russian army is a command issue of Russia and has nothing to do with a certain minister soldier. Kadyrov also said that it was caused by a command error in Russia.